Think tank presses Blue Coat over censorship concerns

Blue Coat, which makes software and appliances that monitor and restrict web traffic, has been criticized before

A Canadian think tank called on Tuesday for continued scrutiny of U.S. security vendor Blue Coat Systems after a new technical analysis showed wide use of its products in countries with human rights and censorship concerns.

Blue Coat takes malware hunt to the node

The Citizen Lab, based at the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto, published a report that showed Blue Coat technology widely deployed at key choke points in telecommunication systems.

The report was the result of several weeks of technical analysis that ended earlier this month and focused on two Blue Coat products: ProxySG and PacketShaper. Citizen Lab said those products have specific functions for surveillance, filtering, and censorship.

It found ProxySG in use by Egypt, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Blue Coat's PacketShaper product is used in Afghanistan, Bahrain, China, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Nigeria, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Turkey, and Venezuela, the report said.

"We hope Blue Coat will take this report as an opportunity to explain their due diligence process to ensure that their devices are not used in ways that violate human rights," the Citizen Lab said in its report.

Blue Coat officials could not immediately be reached. The company admitted in late 2011 that some of its web-filtering products ended up in Syria despite a U.S. embargo. After an investigation, Blue Coat said the shipment of products in question was destined for Dubai and then onto Iraq.

Blue Coat is just one of a handful of companies who make similar software, including McAfee, Cisco, Websense, and Zscaler, the report said. Those companies' products have a "dual-use" nature that demands oversight to ensure against human rights abuses, Citizen Lab said.

"Such an approach requires an understanding of the likely end use of the technology in any given scenario, as well as carefully crafted legal and regulatory language," the report said.

Citizen Lab also advocated that companies could do their own human rights impact assessments into how their products may potentially be used.

The report said Blue Coat included in its marketing materials a case study involving King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Saudi Arabia's science agency which is also responsible for filtering web sites deemed offensive.

"It appears Blue Coat Systems may not have fully appreciated or addressed the ramifications of such deployment of its technology, given its inclusion in marketing materials of KACST as a client 'success story,''' the report said.

In contrast, Citizen Lab said that one of Blue Coat's competitors, Websense, joined the Global Network Initiative, a group the encourages ethical decision-making amongst IT companies.

"The more companies take proactive measures to prevent complicity in human rights abuses, the more normalization of corporate social responsibility will take place within the industry," the report said.

Send news tips and comments to jeremy_kirk@idg.com. Follow me on Twitter: @jeremy_kirk

This story, "Think tank presses Blue Coat over censorship concerns" was originally published by IDG News Service .

Editors' Picks
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies