Three years later, has Oracle's Sun buy paid off?

Cash flow has far exceeded purchase price, according to Oracle President Mark Hurd, but an investment researcher remains doubtful

Oracle may have had its hands full lately dealing with Java security issues, but the company's acquisition of Java founder Sun Microsystems three years ago this month still has paid off, company President Mark Hurd said. An investment research firm, though, still has listed Oracle's Sun acquisition as reason to sell off Oracle stock.

Asked during a teleconference Monday afternoon whether the $7.4 acquisition had paid for itself, Hurd responded, "Yes -- materially so." Cash flow from the deal, he said, "has far exceeded the purchase price of the acquisition."

[ALSO: HP could have joined Oracle on Sun deal]

[ See InfoWorld's retrospective on Oracle's Sun acquisition one year later. | For more news on Java, subscribe to InfoWorld's Enterprise Java newsletter. ]

Not bad, considering Sun was reportedly losing $100 million a month in 2009 while the sale was still pending. The purchase, Hurd said, had multiple dimensions, including Java, which included both a financial element and an enablement piece relating to Oracle development activities; a support base; and a positive hardware revenue stream. Also, the acquisition helped Oracle develop such products as its Exadata database machine and Exalogic Engineered System product lines.

Hurd did not address the spate of Java security issues of late that Oracle has inherited with its Sun acquisition. The company in recent blogs and during a meeting with Java user groups pledged to be more open about the issue and continue working on the problems.

But Zacks Equity Research, in listing reasons to buy or sell Oracle stock in a late-December report, cites issues with the Sun acquisition as reason to sell. "While the acquisition of Sun makes Oracle the foremost player in the database software market, we remain concerned about the company's integration of Sun," Zacks said. "We believe that it will take years to provide incremental benefit and will come at the expense of relatively lower cash flow due to increased working capital requirements." The integration also pulls Oracle away from its traditional software-only business model, presenting a corresponding negative impact on margins, Zacks said.

Zacks also cites declining hardware revenues, putting pressure on the software segment to drive results. "We believe that lower hardware volumes will continue to hurt top-line growth going forward." Zacks also notes Oracle lost its patent infringement claims case against Google, which involved Java. "Oracle s strategy of earning incremental revenues by licensing the software received a significant blow following the Google judgment."

Countering Zacks, analyst Al Hilwa, of IDC, believes Oracle's Sun acquisition has likely helped Oracle. "I have no precise sense of this, but likely most gains were in the Exa-appliance line, which blends hardware and software in a single offering. Oracle was able to leverage Sun's hardware to create this new space, and from what we are lead to understand during their financial conferences, the revenue streams for these appliances has been on a great growth trajectory." Oracle also has likely been able to cross-sell to Sun customers who had not been Oracle customers, Hilwa said.

This article, "Three years later, has Oracle's Sun buy paid off?," was originally published at InfoWorld.com. Follow the latest developments in business technology news and get a digest of the key stories each day in the InfoWorld Daily newsletter. For the latest developments in business technology news, follow InfoWorld.com on Twitter.

This story, "Three years later, has Oracle's Sun buy paid off?" was originally published by InfoWorld.

From CSO: 7 security mistakes people make with their mobile device
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies