Obama's NSA surveillance reforms get mixed reviews

New restrictions should not mark the end of surveillance reform, say experts

President Barack Obama's new restrictions on the government's mass collection of American's phone data should mark the start, not the end, of reform in U.S. spying, privacy advocates say.

[NSA revelations bolstering demands for congressional action]

In a Friday speech, Obama outlined a new surveillance-policy directive that would curtail some operations of the U.S. National Security Agency and bolster safeguards for the privacy of Americans and non-citizens.

While the changes were welcomed, privacy advocates said the president and Congress should go much further in protecting privacy.

"The president's speech on surveillance today proposed some welcome first steps toward appropriately limiting an expanding surveillance state," Julian Sanchez, research fellow at the CATO Institute, said in his blog.

The president said the NSA would no longer be able to decide on its own when to pull information from a phone records database. Instead, the agency would have to first get permission from the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

In addition, restrictions on tracing phone numbers connected to the original number under investigation was expected to limit the tally of people who could fall under NSA surveillance.

Longer term, Obama wants the database of phone records moved out of government control. He gave advisers 60 days to work with Congress in devising an alternative location.

Civil libertarians object to the existence of a phone records database, so Obama's directive did little to satisfy their concerns.

"Storage of bulk records by companies or a third party would be merely a shuffling of the chairs, not a real reform," Greg Nojeim, director of the Center for Democracy & Technology's Project on Freedom, Security and Surveillance, said in a statement.

TechFreedom, a nonprofit think tank on public policy related to technology, called moving of phone data a "fig leaf that conceals the real issue: the legal standard of access."

The organization favors raising the legal hurdle the NSA must clear in order to get access to phone records. Currently, it only has to establish "reasonable suspicion that a particular number is linked to a terrorist organization."

The American Civil Liberties Union praised the additional scrutiny by the FISA court and Obama's creation of a panel of civil liberties, technology and privacy advocates. The panel will be given security clearances and will represent Americans before the FISA court. Currently, the NSA faces no opposition when seeking permission to gather information on U.S. citizens.

Sanchez of the CATO Institute was disappointed that the president did not address the NSA's reported efforts to undermine encryption standards. He also noted that the president chose not to curtail other mass data-collection programs, such as the gathering of data on international money transfers from companies such as Western Union. Such a program is run by the Central Intelligence Agency.

Nevertheless, the president has set a foundation for building more privacy safeguards, he said.

[Lessons for CSOs in Snowden exploit of NSA networks]

"Most fundamentally, Congress must now act to cement these reforms in legislation -- and to extend them -- to ensure safeguards implemented by one president cannot be secretly undone by another," Sanchez said.

Obama's reforms followed months of revelations of NSA gathering of massive amounts of data from telecommunication and Internet companies. The global surveillance activity stemmed from documents released to select media by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who lives in Moscow under temporary asylum.

This story, "Obama's NSA surveillance reforms get mixed reviews" was originally published by CSO .

Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies