Network World
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools
Error 404--Not Found

Error 404--Not Found

From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:

10.4.5 404 Not Found

The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent.

If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.


Johna Till Johnson: Symantec’s Backup Exec 10d
Dave Kearns: Elemental Security’s Elemental Compliance System
Jim Kobielus: U3’s U3 smart-drive
Ira Brodsky: Belkin’s Pre-N wireless LAN
Winn Schwartau: Apple’s MacTel

Going above and beyond

Page 2 of 2

The results of this TCO astounded me. For my small enterprise, owning a WinTel box for three years costs twice as much as owning a MacTel. When I talked with several of our clients, I found that the burdened cost of ownership per PC - just for support - ranged from $1,300 to $4,000 per year.

If I can cut down on the burden of monthly and annual subscriptions, and dramatically reduce my annualized per-seat support costs, not only does my TCO go way down, but as an added plus my technical headache factors decrease, too.

Apple's two- to five-year road map is clear. As it begins to stake ground beyond small enterprises, it will want a piece of the global enterprise. In June 2005, Apple CEO Steve Jobs said: "We are talking to Intel." Duh! How hard is it to imagine that OS X was simultaneously being developed for an Intel platform, and how long has the OS X parental code been running on Intel? The answer is for years. The MacTel Skunkworks has been in place for several years. I read this as reliability.

Apple's non-iPod growth is going to need to come from displacing Microsoft's Vista as the de facto next-generation operating system for enterprise migration. At recent security shows I have seen that more than 50% of my compatriots use Macs and recognize that OS X was a huge leap forward. We are all suggesting some forms of migration. The small enterprise and home office should migrate completely, and some midsize enterprises will take the plunge as what I called the KISS-OS becomes more cemented in the IT zeitgeist.

I believe that much of Apple's enterprise future will rest with the adaptation of the appliance mindset and eradicating the cultural meme: one size fits all.

If you can live with some of Apple's arrogance (don't expect too many niceties - Apple is an engineering company, after all), you should really take a look at the security TCO of WinTel vs. Mac. If you are honest with your answers, you may find that you can get many of your enterprise endpoints more secure than ever for a lot less than you thought.

Who's using it? I don't expect that any major enterprise is going to go out and convert 100,000 seats to MacTel. But I am seeing large organizations deploying Mac networks across specific departments, and I mean more than just graphics. Entire sales and marketing departments within some financial firms are actively migrating to Mac and MacTel. Gene Fredriksen, chief information security officer for Raymond James Financial, in St. Petersburg, Fla., says he is deploying additional Macs within portions of the enterprise to reduce TCO of user computing.

Mac migrations in the low tech area of big companies will precede any global shift. Why should a company pay more than $2,000 a year for PC support of a clerk who only uses Web applications when a $500 Mac Mini will do? Retail environments and customer service desks are poised for a more reliable and less expensive smart terminal. Many distributed corporate applications are appliance-oriented, with only one or two uses. The current bloated and fault-prone "I can do anything if you know what you're doing" operating system is not for everyone, and we are paying for it dearly in IT budgets.

OS X also keeps users from doing things they shouldn't. Most enterprises do not want users installing software on their machines - they want a box to run mail client and browser, and a couple of Office applications. Effective restricted rights are the default, and make Mac/MacTel ideal for non-administrative enterprise distribution.

How much will it cost the average enterprise? MacTel is priced from $1,300; enterprise volume purchase agreements also are available.

< Previous story: Belkin's Pre-N wireless LAN family | Next story: Fave raves >

Going above and beyond By Anonymous on December 17, 2006, 10:41 pm Reply | Read entire comment As a long time Macintosh user, this is something that has been well know within Mac circles for years. It is my assumption that IT only wanted WinTel machines because...

Seconded By Anon on February 12, 2009, 12:31 pm Reply | Read entire comment It is intuitively obvious that if less support is required, there is going to be a smaller budget for support. Those currently providing support can only view...

First guy is right By David Emery on July 4, 2008, 3:15 pm Reply | Read entire comment I've heard many times from IT that they don't want to learn anything other than what they're familiar with already, and I believe the implication that IT directors...

All comments (4)

Note: Register to have your user name appear; otherwise your comment will show up as "Anonymous."

*Anonymous comments will only appear once they are approved by the moderator.

Copyright 2008 Network World Inc.

Related links

What do you think? Discuss Schwartau's thoughts on MacTel.

MacOS X worm wiggles its way into wild

Is Apple creating the FCC's worst fear?

Google, Apple top 2005 poll of most influential brands