Error 404--Not Found

Error 404--Not Found

From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:

10.4.5 404 Not Found

The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent.

If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.

Search and DocFinder
 
Search help/advanced search

 


News NetFlash: Daily News Internat'l News This Week in NW The Edge Net.Worker Features Research Buyer's Guides Reviews Technology Primers Vendor Profiles Forums Columnists Knowledgebase Help Desk Dr. Intranet Gearhead Careers Free Newsletters Subscription Center Seminars/Events Reprints/Links White Papers Partner with Us Site Map Contact Us Awards Corporate info Home
Error 404--Not Found

Error 404--Not Found

From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:

10.4.5 404 Not Found

The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent.

If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.









    

By Carolyn Duffy Marsan
Network World, 09/24/01

Money for nothing and calls for free. To paraphrase the English rock band Dire Straits, that's what corporate network managers want in these fiscally lean times.

Many companies have made major investments in Internet-based backbone networks, and they're looking for ways to leverage those investments. One way to ring up savings is to run internal voice and fax communications over these already-purchased IP networks. But to make voice-over-IP applications work, companies need some kind of a translation mechanism between the public switched telephone network (PSTN) and the Internet.

Advertisement:

Enter Enum, a simple but powerful protocol that's generating a great deal of interest among telecom carriers and Internet players. Enum lets an end user type a telephone number into a Web browser and access a URL listing the available Internet resources for that number, such as an IP telephony address, e-mail address and Web address.

As vendors roll out support for the protocol in devices such as Internet-enabled PBXs and telephones, and service providers build in the required directories and other infrastructure, Enum will enable a much-needed service for initiating telephone calls over the Internet. Enum also offers the promise of providing a single point of contact for multiple communications devices, from phones to PCs to fax machines.

  Enum

"The most significant interest in Enum is for IP telephony," says Tony Rutkowski, vice president of Internet strategy at VeriSign of Mountain View, Calif., which plans to introduce private Enum services for corporations later this year.

To Top

Enum evolution

The Internet Engineering Task Force finalized the Enum specification about a year ago, and the first Enum products and services are due out this fall. Among the companies that helped develop Enum were Cisco, Lucent, Nortel and AT&T.

Enum is expected to roll out in the corporate market first. Companies that run their own telephone systems will be able to map their employees' telephone numbers to a private Enum service that points to corresponding IP telephony addresses, e-mail addresses, fax numbers and cell phone numbers. These companies can use Enum to direct internal telephone calls to their IP backbone networks, which will cut the cost of long-distance calls between branch offices.

  IP telephony

"For really large enterprises with multiple call servers, they can use Enum internally to cut down costs," says Jim Pilgrim, an engineer with Alcatel tracking Enum's development in the standards bodies. "But for most companies, the real savings will come from external phone calling" between companies over the Internet, Pilgrim says.

These savings won't materialize until Enum is available on the Internet and a critical mass of corporate users evolves (see Enum's ROI.) And that could take years because policy makers are still debating how to introduce Enum into the Internet's DNS.

Telephone numbers are highly regulated, with each country having sovereignty over the assignment of numbers within its country code. At issue is whether countries also will have authority over Enum registrations and how best to support competitive but interoperable Enum services.

Most telephony and Internet companies favor a single, global top-level domain for Enum services dubbed "Tier 0." Each country would have a central Tier 1 registry that operates underneath the Enum top-level domain. Service providers would offer corporate Enum registration services at the Tier 2 level.

A handful of companies, including VeriSign, support the idea of multiple top-level domains for Enum services.

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU), which oversees telephone numbering on a global basis, is meeting this month to discuss its Enum strategy. Vendors say they hope consensus will emerge on how the ITU will move forward with a public Enum service.

"It's going to take a long time for a global, public Enum service to be available," predicts Doug Ranalli, founder and chief strategy officer at start-up NetNumber of Lowell, Mass., which was the first company to offer Enum registrations. "But the enterprise space can move forward independent of that process. . . As enterprises move forward with converged network platforms, that represents an opportunity for Enum."

Three U.S. companies, NetNumber, VeriSign and NeuStar, the North American telephone numbering authority, are running Enum test beds. These test beds have attracted several hundred participants, including software and hardware developers and service providers.

To Top

Questions to ask Enum service providers.

  • How often do you update your Enum directory?
  • What fees do you charge for Enum registrations, additions, deletions and changes?
  • What security mechanism does your Enum directory support?
  • What protections do you offer against outsiders spamming your Enum directory?
  • How are you designing your private Enum services to accommodate uncertainty about how a public Enum service will evolve?
  • The first Enum products are likely to be Internet-enabled telephones, PBXs and call managers. These products will be aimed at corporations rolling out private Enum services in conjunction with voice-over-IP applications.

    "We are working with the equipment vendors to build our Enum service right into their applications, so when a service provider sells to a customer, [the customer's] address is populated in our Enum directory automatically," Ranalli says. "How you provision the directory and how you query the directory have to be embedded in the application." 

    Two gray areas for Enum are security and performance. IP telephony services need to be as secure and as fast as today's telephone services, vendors say.

    "We take for granted when we make a telephone call that the caller is me and that no one else is listening in unless they have a search warrant," says Lori Whitted, vice president of business development for VeriSign Global Registry Services in Dulles, Va.

    To achieve that, Enum service providers will need streamlined security mechanisms for checking the authentication of telephone numbers as well as speedy resolution. Hence, authentication vendor VeriSign's interest in the protocol. Rutkowski adds that some ideas for multitiered public Enum implementations would result in seconds-long delays and resolutions that are too slow for Internet users.

    "We think there's an opportunity to make Enum more secure and faster than the technology that's here today," he says.

    To Top

    Enum meets SIP

    Most Enum proponents predict the technology's initial use will be alongside another emerging IP telephony technology called Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). SIP is a signaling protocol used to establish Internet telephone calls, multimedia conferences, chat sessions and interactive communications.

    "We think Enum is going to point to a SIP address and then an IP address," Rutkowski says.

    The first SIP trials were held this summer. Most of the vendors announcing plans to support Enum already offer SIP.

    Enum's ROI
    Cheap and easy is the pitch.

    Enum is not expected to add significantly to the cost of IP telephony products, with it likely being deployed as a software upgrade.

    "With voice over IP, the whole value proposition is that you save money at the end of the day," says Lori Whitted, vice president of business development for VeriSign Global Registry Services of Dulles, Va. "It may be that your IP PBX costs a little more with Enum, but you should be getting a return on that investment."

    Click here for more.

    Columbia University in New York is one of the first organizations to test how well SIP and Enum work together. So far, results are encouraging, says Henning Schulzrinne, associate professor of computer science.

    Columbia is running a SIP test bed that supports voice communications, multimedia conferencing and unified messaging for 12 employees in its computer science department. Columbia added Enum support last spring using software from NetNumber. Enum handles the mapping between the telephone numbers active on the SIP test bed and the SIP URL used to handle calls.

    Enum helps during the transition period from a traditional to an IP PBX, when some users are on each, Schulzrinne says. "You'd use Enum as the central database to keep track of whether a person has a traditional PBX number, in which case no translation is required, or a SIP URL that you'd use to route the call to an IP phone locally or off campus," he says.

    He also sees a role for Enum in helping companies forward telephone calls for employees who move from one site to another.

    "There's a way to do that by performing some PBX magic, but it's much easier with Enum," Schulzrinne says.

    To Top

    Outstanding issues

    Although efforts such as the Columbia test indicate Enum technology is stable, vendors are trying to clarify implementation issues. One such issue is how Enum records, which show what Internet services are available for a particular telephone number, will be administered in the Internet.

    "How do competing service providers provision Enum records into and out of an Enum database in a way that they trust each other?" asks Matt Wald, vice president of IP services at NeuStar of Washington, D.C.

    Enum administration issues likewise need to be hashed out before services are introduced on the Internet.

    NeuStar wants the U.S. government or an industry group to host a competitive procurement to select a Tier 1 Enum administrator for the U.S., and NeuStar hopes to win that procurement. The Tier 1 administrator would handle Enum transactions between service providers, while the service providers would offer Tier 2 registration services to U.S. companies.

    Wald predicts the U.S. will have a public Enum Tier 1 central registry by the second half of next year.

    From the enterprise perspective, all the application and service information will be held by the Tier 2 service provider.

    "Tier 2 is where the action is. . . That's where AT&T's interest lies," says Steven Lind, standards strategy manager for internation
    al and IP numbering with AT&T Labs of Florham Park, N.J. AT&T is banking that most large companies would prefer to outsource Tier 2 Enum registrations.

    Although these issues must be resolved for Enum to become the transparent megadirectory its proponents claim it will be, its progress is promising.

    To Top

    Related links:

    Other Signature Series editions

    Matching phone numbers to Web sites Network World E-Commerce Newsletter,
    07/16/01

    Vendors move to bridge Web and phone network
    Network World, 07/09/01

    NetFlash: To regulate or not to regulate
    Network World NetFlash Newsletter, 07/09/01

    IP telephony technology finding wider acceptance
    Network World, 04/30/01

    Apply for your free subscription to Network World. Click here.

    Get Copyright Clearance
    Request a reprint or permission to use this article.

    Send this article to a colleague

    Please select a type of format for the email you want to send:
    TEXT
    HTML
    Recipient's name:

    Recipient's e-mail:
    Your name:

    Your e-mail:
    Comments:

    Feedback

    Tell us your thoughts on this article or the issues raised in it. We'll cc: the author and editors on all comments.

    Comments:

    Name:
    E-mail address:

    Can we post your comments in an online forum on the topic?
    Yes No

    What did you think of this article?
    Very useful Somewhat useful Not at all useful

    Would you want to see:
    More articles on this topic
    Fewer articles on this topic

    Thank you! When you click Submit, you'll be taken back to this article.

     

    TAKE THE NEWS WITH YOU
    Access the latest networking news via your handheld or wireless device! With Fusion Mobile you'll get the day’s top headlines from Network World Fusion.


    Sign up today!

    Advertisement:


    Editorial Partners program
    Three free and easy ways to bring Network World's in-depth editorial content to your own Web site.
    Learn more