- What does Cisco have against Quebec?
- Attrition.org nails another nitwit
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Seven cloud-computing security risks
- 20 great Windows open source projects
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Moderator-Julie: Welcome to Network World Chats. Our guest today is Jeff Doyle, celebrity author, Cisco Subnet blogger and networking guru. He has come prepared to answer your questions on all things routing.
Jeff_Doyle: Welcome, everyone! In most every technical meeting I assume I'm the dumbest person in the room, and discussions like this are a great opportunity for me to prove my assumptions correct. Nevertheless, I'll do my best to answer any of your questions. But let me start with a funny little story. I'm in my home office right now, and have had a problem lately with rabbits getting into the office (don't ask). Consequently the office is now my dog Reggie's favorite hangout – several bunnies have met a fast but slightly gruesome end. Hopefully we won't have any "Wild Kingdom" events while in the middle of the chat, but Reggie the mighty hunter is sitting nearby with a keen eye on the utility opening… With that as background, let's get to it.
IPv6 and IPv4
Moderator-Keith: We have a pretty long list of pre-submitted questions that people sent us via the Network World Chat page earlier this week. So while Jeff types answers to your live questions, we'll be posting the pre-submitted questions/answers throughout the chat. Here's the first one:
So, besides the fact that service providers want people to go to IPv6, why should an enterprise deploy it now? If not now, when should it be deployed? Any examples of large enterprises using it in the business world and what kinds of problems did they have to solve before it worked flawlessly?
Jeff_Doyle: Many of my fellow IPv6 advocates hate me when I say it, but I don't think there is much motivation for enterprises to adopt IPv6 anytime soon. IPv6 is important for service providers and any other entities that burn through public IP addresses on a regular basis. All but the largest enterprises don't so that; they can get along just fine behind NAT.
Enterprise interest will rise as they do need new public addresses and they find that the only thing they can get from their provider is IPv6. When it gets to be a bigger hassle to do IPv6 on the outside of a NAT and IPv4 on the inside, they'll start to adopt IPv6. My prediction is that this will happen somewhere in the 2012 - 2015 timeframe.
I am slowly converting my office Firefox. I looked at the owners PC, a PBX techs PC and they had upgraded...- Anonymous
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (5)
RE: IPv6 in the EnterpriseBy Josh Stephens on November 19, 2007, 6:14 pmJeff, Great discussion here. Last time I saw you was out in Denver I think. Seem like you're staying busy... Regarding the IPv6 discussion, I agree with what...
Reply | Read entire comment
Editor steps up -- my public apologies to Jeff DoyleBy Julie Bort on November 12, 2007, 4:29 pmHi all, I'm the one that wrote that headline. I apologize to Jeff and to anyone else who read the headline. I have changed the header of this chat, too. As for...
Reply | Read entire comment
Re: FuggedaboutitBy jdoyle on November 12, 2007, 9:40 amDear Friends,I did not say anything to the effect of "forgetting about" IPv6, and have a distinct problem with the way what I did say has been represented...
Reply | Read entire comment
IPv6: Pay attention to your public DMZ servers now...By john Curran on November 11, 2007, 3:18 pmJeff - As discussed, it could be quite some time before enterprises have to worry about IPv6 internally. However, that's definitely not the case for...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: IPv6: Important to enterprises in five years.By Cisco Subnet on November 8, 2007, 7:48 pmSo, the IPv4 sky is not falling. Net risk to you for not jumping on IPv6 now (if you have enough IP addresses) nada. If you have additional questions for Jeff Doyle?...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments