Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
Report: US FCC to allow payments for speedier traffic
China working on Linux replacement for Windows XP
FCC adds $9 billion to broadband subsidy fund
Raspberry Pi alternatives emerge to fill need for speed
It's now possible to wirelessly charge 40 smartphones from 16 feet away
Ex-FCC commissioner to head CTIA in latest Washington shuffle
Go time traveling with Google Maps
While Heartbleed distracts, hackers hit US universities
Survey respondents shun much-hyped mobile shopping technologies
Survey respondents shun much-hyped mobile shopping technologies
7 Ways to Advance Your Project Management Career
How Apple's billion dollar sapphire bet will pay off
US to vote on sharp increase in broadband subsidies
iPhone 6 rumor rollup for the week ending April 18
NSA spying revelations have tired out China's Huawei
Arista co-founder may have switch maker by its jewels
Apple kicks off public OS X beta testing
Open source pitfalls – and how to avoid them
AT&T's expanded 1 Gbps fiber rollout could go head to head with Google
BlackBerry Releases BES 10 Security Update to Address 'Heartbleed' Flaw
Verizon: Web apps are the security punching bag of the Internet
Cisco announces security service linked with new operations centers
Dell launches virtual storage accelerator, aims to boost SAN performance
Free OS X Mavericks now powers half of all Macs
/

MPLS gives frame relay new extranet life


Frame relay is a great wide-area technology except for one thing: It doesn't make any sense for 21st century networking.

Let me modify that before the e-mails start flying. The graying founders of the zippy and bursty variable-length packets we call frame relay always knew the technology had one potential drawback: What happens if all the sites on the network wanted to talk to each other?

Twice the frame relay community came up with an answer that didn't pass the market test. First, there was the idea of full meshing: pre-establish a permanent virtual circuit between every pair of sites.

A little math combined with the per-circuit pricing culture of the telecom industry showed why this failed. The number of site pairs grows exponentially as the network sizes up. Did you think carriers were going to give away the extra permanent virtual circuits (PVC)?

The second idea was switched virtual circuits (SVC), basically a standby mapping of all network sites with the promise of charging only for the usage sent by any one site to another. But usage-based billing systems for SVCs have taken forever to mature, and SVCs have been adopted by few carriers.

Perhaps the real issue all along was urgency. The number of frame relay ports rose above one million on the strength of classic terminal-to-host and client/server enterprise networking. Now along comes the IP revolution with the promise of bringing the world onto the network, and companies are thinking of extending what are essentially private networks into the public sphere.

That's why the third time may be the charm for frame relay carriers. First AT&T, and now MCI WorldCom, have launched frame relay services based on Cisco's implementation of the emerging Multi-protocol Label Switching (MPLS) standard in their carrier boxes.

AT&T's IP-Enabled Frame Relay and MCI WorldCom's Business Class IP are based on the idea of requiring each network site to send only a single frame relay PVC into the carrier's ATM network core. From there, the Cisco MPLS software assigns a label to each packet that contains information on what type of closed user group - or virtual private network (VPN) - the packet belongs to. Via IP addressing, the packet can then be sent to any other site on the network.

Among the beauties of this system: Companies can create VPNs for multiple extranets - say, different classes of suppliers or customers. Pure IP VPN security measures are not needed because the network retains the more-inherent security of frame relay and ATM. Router utilization can be optimized because the carrier switch does more of the work. And users get more life out of their existing frame relay implementations.

Sure, this system may be a weird hybrid. It's not a real IP VPN, and not just anyone can dial in, because they'd still need a frame relay interface. But when have corporate networks not been characterized by hybrids? These new services may be just the ticket for a lot of users extending their networks - at least for their next three-year contract.

RELATED LINKS

Rohde is a senior editor with Network World. He can be reached at drohde@nww.com.

What do you think? Jump into nwfusion.talk and start a thread.

More Eye on the Carrier columns


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.