Out of chaos will come desirable new services
Two weeks ago, we covered the challenges facing service providers (and their customers) in an imploding telecommunications market. Now it's time to look on the bright side.
The pressure on carriers to increase revenue is driving them to roll out lower-cost, higher-performance services, which can prove a boon to companies. Here's a sampling of service offerings on the horizon.
IP VPNs come in a variety of flavors (IP Security, Multi-protocol Label Switching, and network-based, to name just a few) and provide companies with alternatives for connecting to remote users, remote offices, outside organizations or all of the above.
Marketing hype aside, IP VPNs provide a main advantage over conventional services such as frame relay and ATM: flexible bandwidth with reliable service quality. Unlike frame relay services, which effectively top out at 1.5M bit/sec, IP VPN services are available at speeds ranging from 25K bit/sec to OC-48. And IP VPNs can be engineered to provide effectively the same quality of service (QoS) that's available across ATM (which, incidentally, doesn't work well at speeds of less than 1.5M bit/sec).
Bottom line: At long last, IP VPN services are gearing up to be ready for prime time.
Most companies have robust 100M bit/sec-to-Gigabit Ethernet infrastructures in the LAN - compared with the considerably more heterogeneous environments a decade ago - making Ethernet WAN services a logical extension of the LAN infrastructure. Also, applications such as remote storage and disaster recovery can make effective use of the bandwidth.
Still to be determined: the real value proposition of Layer 2 services that lack native QoS compared with Layer 3 services.
Why would a carrier want to do this?
Simple: for customer retention. Say a service provider has an enterprise customer who needs connectivity to cities not served by that provider.
Today the provider has two choices: Decline the business or arrange an agreement with another provider, typically via a network-to-network interface (NNI). NNI-based interconnects tend to adversely affect service quality, and carrier-to-carrier agreements have a way of falling apart - witness the formal dissolution of the AT&T/British Telecom partnership earlier this month.
A solution circumventing these difficulties would keep both companies and service providers happy.
RELATED LINKS
Johnson is senior vice president and CTO for Greenwich Technology Partners, a network consulting and engineering firm. Her column appears biweekly. She can be reached atjohna@greenwichtech.com.
More Eye on the Carrier columns
More with Less
Ways to save on your networking budget, from hardware to services.

