Enterprise WLANs: The kinder, gentler shakeout
Tolly on Technology
By
Kevin Tolly
,
Network World
, 04/26/2004
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
As wireless LAN start-up after WLAN start-up emerged to take on the enterprise over the past 18 months, observers realized that a few years down the line, they wouldn't all be
around. There was simply a limit to the number of companies the market would support regardless of quality of product, vision
and leadership. But, the growing remake of companies from systems providers to IP and component providers looks to be a "kinder,
gentler" shakeout that benefits everyone.
As the enterprise WLAN market emerged, I was constantly comparing its progress with the Layer 3 switching events of the late
1990s. The reasons were twofold: First, the introduction of that technology was the last "seismic shift" in the enterprise
prior to WLAN, and second, today's WLAN companies are virtual reincarnations of some of the leading switching start-ups of
the '90s. (Key past employees of switching trailblazers Alteon, Extreme Networks, Foundry Networks and others often are a
core part of today's WLAN vendors such as AirFlow Networks, Aruba Wireless Networks and Trapeze Networks, to name a few.)
In one real sense, though, that's where the similarity with the LAN switching period ends. It was hard enough then to sell
switches into an arguably less solidly Cisco world. It's more difficult with WLAN systems.
Even putting aside Cisco's iron grip on accounts that has only intensified in the intervening years, WLAN has a fundamental
handicap. Where each LAN switch was its own technological island - and different brands, models and even generations could
be intermixed - WLAN systems are, well, systems.
There are always at least two pieces: the distributed radio and the WLAN switch. Most deployments will require many distributed
radios and likely multiple switches. Buying a WLAN system is to buying a LAN switch as marriage is to dating. It's a big commitment
and not one easily changed without severe consequences.
Given the nature of wireless this aspect is not going to change. And, given the nature of the commitment, and the knowledge
that a shakeout inevitably occurs, it's not surprising that corporations are reluctant to entrust their future to any company
not yet 2 years old. From the vendor's perspective, it's a tough task to imagine matching the presence and support of companies
such as Alcatel, Cisco and Nortel.
Comment