- Is the Cisco MARS mission going to abort?
- First iPhone worm spreads Rick Astley wallpaper
- 10 stunning 3D buildings made with Google SketchUp
- Open source software ready for big business
- Four reasons to buy (and one reason to avoid) the Droid
"We must also work to change a number of customer perceptions, including the views that older versions of Office and Windows are good enough, and that Microsoft is not sufficiently focused on security." - Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer in a July 6 company-wide e-mail.
Ballmer's words are hard to take without being cynical. As Owen Thomas quipped in a recent issue of his Ditherati newsletter, this was "Ballmer, addressing employees on the urgent need to deceive customers more aggressively."
Microsoft has bent the rules of business, but we must be realistic: We created the monster.
We wanted inexpensive software and there was Microsoft - the right company with the right products at the right time. We let ourselves be sold on its "vision" and its story. Of course its rose-colored glasses filtered its vision but it never actually fooled us, it just sold us the products and the stories we wanted.
Microsoft continues to take advantage of its opportunities in ways that have been judged illegal and in other ways that are unethical but not unlawful.
When I say unethical, I mean that Microsoft intentionally created software to "lock" customers into its way of doing things despite the consequences.
These consequences appeared in the form of instability and poor supportability. You can trace that back to the monolithic and clumsy architecture of Windows, compromised by allowances for its own applications, and to the embedding of applications such as browsing and multimedia rendering as core operating system functionality.
Who could defend Microsoft pushing its "standards" in preference to established de jure standards? Or what about where it's had to implement de jure standards and done a horrible job of it - for example, Outlook's appalling IMAP support.
We all bought into its "innovative" products because we had business problems that had to be solved now, and Microsoft had the solutions. Unfortunately, neither Microsoft nor the best and brightest in the IT industry ever foresaw where we would wind up.
So as much as we should like to be understanding and constructive with regard to the monster we made, that isn't possible because the monster hasn't matured, and we can't (and can't afford to) kill it off. Alas, it is still clumping around the countryside, grasping arms to the fore, dead-fish gaze seeing only what it wants to see, leaving chaos in its wake.
Comment