Cisco takes on managed services
By
Jeff Kaplan
,
Network World
, 10/04/2004
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Cisco's acquisitions historically have been early indicators of the company's strategic direction and bellwethers of broader industry
trends. Whether acquiring companies such as Komodo Technology to build its VoIP product portfolio or Linksys to enter the
home network market, Cisco's deals have been a critical component of its product development and new market-penetration initiatives.
But Cisco seldom has used acquisitions to expand its support services. That is why Cisco's recent acquisition of managed service provider NetSolve is so intriguing.
Founded in 1987, NetSolve became one of the first independent providers of remote network and IT infrastructure management
services in the mid-1990s. Despite surviving the dot-com crash, NetSolve has limited name recognition among enterprise decision-makers
because it has sold its services primarily through indirect channels, private-labeling them to companies such as AT&T and
NEC.
Cisco's acquisition of NetSolve comes at a time when industry acceptance of managed services appears to be on the rise, but
NetSolve's viability at the time of the purchase was still uncertain. Nearly every analyst firm has forecast double-digit
growth for managed services. Yet in July, NetSolve reported a quarterly revenue decline and significant operating losses.
Much of NetSolve's problems were attributed to the termination of three reseller agreements with AT&T: for managed router
services; managed DSU services sold as part of AT&T's Frame Relay Plus offering; and as part of a WAN management contract
AT&T had with The Home Depot. Despite its long relationship with NetSolve, AT&T decided to deliver these managed services
on its own.
Under the circumstances, it isn't hard to understand why NetSolve was happy to accept Cisco's acquisition offer. What is less
clear is why Cisco decided to acquire ailing NetSolve.
Cisco has a long history of offering automated, Web-based technical support services rather than the labor-intensive field
support services that have weighed down more traditional vendors such as Avaya, Lucent and Nortel. Although Cisco's competitors
have invested significantly in managed services in an effort to shift their service delivery models to more economical, remote
management techniques, these services haven't become a major piece of their revenue yet.
Comment