- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
The week before last I attended the VMworld 2004 conference in San Diego. This event, hosted by VMware, surprised me. I got to the venue a little later than I had planned and went into the general session expecting to see maybe 300 or 400 people. There were about 1,600.
Now, I've been a big fan of VMware for some time because it makes it possible to run multiple copies of multiple operating systems on one machine. Indeed, there was a series of Gearhead columns on the product, which you could characterize as wildly enthusiastic.
VMware was gaining significant interest when EMC acquired the company last January, but little did I realize just how much of an impact VMware had made until I ran into these 1,600 fans.
Moreover the attendees weren't, as one vendor put it, "just from community colleges"; they were from Fortune-size companies, and about 20% came from overseas. Add to that about 30 partners, such as Dell, HP and IBM, and about 250 channel partners, and you can see something profound is happening.
I talked to several attendees, and it appeared two main issues were driving their interest. The first was server consolidation. Some customers have managed to reduce their server population by one-third.
In most enterprise environments server loadings are frequently far below platform capabilities. Running multiple virtual machines lets you take two or three servers running at 15% or 20% utilization and aggregate them onto one server that now runs at maybe 60%. Even better, you can move virtual machines from one physical server to another to readjust physical machine loadings.
Add to that the amount of rack space regained, the decreased power and cooling required, the reduced amount of hardware to maintain, and the fact that you can preserve the politics of server ownership within the organization, and you come up with a very compelling argument for VMware.
Then there is server management. Because of the architecture of VMware, activities such as provisioning, recovering and maintaining servers is vastly simplified. In short, virtual machine technology creates a more cost-effective enterprise infrastructure in just about every important category of service.
Among the partners at the event I saw a number of products that got me way overexcited: Softricity's SoftGrid is what I've wanted for years. It insulates Windows from applications and vice versa, and provides for applications the same vastly improved provisioning and management that VMware provides for operating systems. The combination of VMware and SoftGrid is amazing.
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comment