Despite the recent political results, we are not a divided nation. This is not a political commentary, but one of common interest to all of us in this country, not to mention the rest of the world. We certainly have more in common than we have differences.

In all of my years in information warfare, hanging out with feds, the military and all sorts of people in between, we have hardly ever discussed politics. It didn't matter; we had a job to do. I still do not know the political leanings of my professional friends and colleagues - and I prefer to keep that sort of non-productive divisiveness out of my security mindset. Because, ultimately, we are united, not divided.

We need each other to survive. We need to think and act like partners and competitors at the same time by achieving a healthy symbiotic balance between the two roles. Impossible you say? Au contraire, mon ami!

The most striking example of competitive partnerships might be seen in the nation's Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (ISAC), created by former President Clinton's Presidential Decision Directive 63. As successfully demonstrated in the financial services ISAC, competing banks and insurance companies realize that cooperation in the areas of security and infrastructure protection is necessary for the common good. No one person, company or country lives in electronic isolation. A major security event at one bank is a sure prelude to other banks experiencing similar pain.

Changes in security are occurring inside many top corporations. Traditional stovepiping of security functions is only a hindrance. Cybersecurity requires physical security, both of which require trusted personnel to make it all work. Security departments must integrate their operations more than they ever have. The business-continuity folks need the cybergeeks and the man who fills the back-up generators with oil. The last holdout here, though, is human resources, which prefers absolute hegemony over cooperation. The only way this will change is for senior management to tell HR that they have to play nice with others - even if that means being occasionally politically incorrect in the pursuit of greater corporate security and integrity.

So despite the endless portrayals of embittered foes in politics and business, we are not divided. Despite our healthy disagreements on details, we are in agreement about the goals of computer security.