Firewalls: Jericho winner paints new security picture
By
John Dix
,
Network World
, 08/08/2005
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
The first-place entry in the Jericho Forum's competition for a new answer to security maps neatly to the forum's vision of networks that aren't dependent on Chinese
walls. The competition, in association with the Black Hat conference group, challenged "any team of technology experts to
design a secure architectural solution that is open, interoperable, viable and operates in a de-perimeterized environment."
Principally composed of large companies, the forum argues that perimeter defenses have been rendered useless by Web and e-mail-based
attacks, and that hardened perimeters are "at odds with current and/or future business needs."
The companies, frustrated by what they see as continued industry focus on the broken perimeter model, have banded together
to influence security thinking, as well as product direction and development, with this competition an important step.
The first-place entry was from Thomas Olovsson and Jamie Bodley-Scott from AppGate Security. Their vision: "The central firewall
complex is replaced by a set of distributed firewalls that are placed on all clients and servers. These firewalls are centrally
controlled and can dynamically be configured to allow or deny traffic in the network."
A typical use would be users connect to a gateway called a primary point of interface, and go through an identification/ authentication
dance (single sign-on); services are requested and the system checks on access authorization and service availability, and
then passes on to application servers information about the users' identity and access rights (the servers and services remain
invisible to unauthorized users); application servers grant access to bona fide users and block access for all others; traffic
is encrypted if needed.
To address the challenge's viability requirement, Olovsson and Bodley-Scott propose use of, in part, commonly available technologies:
Kerberos for authentication and authorization; LDAP for centrally storing credentials; and SSL, SSH and IPSec for traffic
encryption. Other aspects of the architecture draw from AppGate's managed portal technology.
"Assuming each object can protect itself, the overall security level achieved in this system can be significantly higher than
before," write Olovsson and Bodley-Scott. "A major reason for this is that all systems are now protected against hostile traffic
regardless of its origin."
Comment