Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Orwell did not guess the worse half of it

'Net Insider By Scott Bradner , Network World , 02/27/2006
Scott Bradner
  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

It has become a cliché to bring up George Orwell's 1948 book 1984 when talking about the ever-increasing pervasiveness of governments monitoring the activities of their citizens in the name of security. But Orwell's apocalyptic picture of a quiet dehumanization missed entirely the most important threat to our privacy and sense of being.

Orwell painted a picture of a world where government has the ability to monitor everyone, everywhere: Individuals never know when they are under surveillance, so tend always to act as if they are.

The most recent reason to invoke Orwell was presented by Harold Hurtt, chief of police in Houston, who suggested that police-run surveillance cameras in public places did not go far enough and [said] that owners of malls and large apartment complexes should be required to install such cameras as well. If that was not enough to set off us civil-liberties types, he also said that in some cases surveillance cameras should be set up to monitor private residences.

Hurtt proposed expanding the number of police-run surveillance cameras to help deal with a shortage of police officers. It is hard to argue that it would not make things easier for the police if they could record everything everyone did and could track robbers back to when they took the gun used in a robbery out from under the bedroom pillow in the morning. Not the kind of world I'd like to live in, but more convenient for the police.

As one might expect, the chief dismissed any privacy concern by saying, "If you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?"

This response has been used recently by the Bush administration in defense of the National Security Agency wiretapping and one that emphasizes the disconnect between the viewers and the viewed. My guess is that almost no one who says this would be happy to have the tables turned to let citizens watch politicians' private lives.

What Orwell did not figure out is that most places - including most of the places Hurtt wants to monitor - are already under watch. It is hard to walk more than a few feet inside a mall or major corporate building without being recorded by a security camera. Many homeowners have installed security or nanny cameras. We are recorded in many - soon, maybe most - places we go.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint

www.sophos.com

Stopping data leakage

Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.

Download the white paper.

Why detection rates aren't enough

Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.

Download the white paper.

Applications: taking back control

Employees installing unauthorized applications is a growing threat to business security and productivity. Cost-effectively reduce this threat by integrating control into your malware protection.

Learn more today.

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed
Get instant email notification when white papers, webcasts, executive guides are added to our library. Stay informed and up-to-date with the latest on IT Technologies with Network World's Resource Alerts.
Network World,to go. Wherever you are. Breaking news delivered to your mobile device. Select the hottest topics in networking and start receiving Network World on your mobile device today.