- What does Cisco have against Quebec?
- Attrition.org nails another nitwit
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Seven cloud-computing security risks
- 20 great Windows open source projects
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Dear Gil:
This letter is meant to be a wake up call. While it points to many missed opportunities and wrong turns that I believe Check Point Software has made I hope you will understand that it is a call to action rather than a criticism of past blunders.
I have been perplexed by Check Point’s actions, or rather lack of actions, for the last seven years. Do you not see that there are opportunities in network security that surpass the existing size of the market? Do you not understand that your current customers are less well protected from outside threats than they were when they first became your customers? Do you not see the warning signs when you lose your major accounts to competitors? Do you not watch the network security start up activity in Silicon Valley? Have you not noticed that Cisco is pulling off a marketing coup with its mis-begotten Network Admission Control scheme?
What do you think? Discuss Stiennon's open letter.
By way of reminder I should recount my connection to Check Point. When you were first trying to get a foot hold in the United States with your revolutionary stateful inspection Firewall-1 product I was director of business development for a reseller in Detroit. I sold the first enterprise firewalls to much of the automotive industry. I also introduced your co-founder, Shlomo Kramer, to Bob Moskowitz who was both heading the Automotive Industry Action Group’s (AIAG) effort to standardize VPN technologies on IPSec and coordinating the IETF’s IPSec efforts. You may recall that Check Point had settled on S-WAN for encrypted communications until that introduction. I accompanied two of your young engineers to MCI’s lab in Plano, Texas, later that year for the first ever IPSec interoperability bake-off hosted by the AIAG and the IETF.
Several years later found me the analyst at Gartner responsible for creating the Firewall Magic Quadrant. Remember when I took all of the firewall vendors out of the leader’s quadrant for lack of vision? That was the time frame that NetScreen managed to carve out a huge segment of the firewall industry through innovation in technology, business model and marketing. How was it possible for a new firewall vendor to enter your space so late and establish a market valuation of $4 billion by the time they sold to Juniper Networks?
Your recent failed attempt to acquire an entity that is commercializing SNORT, the freeware Intrusion Detection System(IDS), was the final sign I needed that you do not understand the network security market, the gaping holes in defenses yet to be filled, the rising tide of cybercrime, or the big picture. This is not a time to copy RSA, IBM, Symantec and McAfee by acquiring multiple pieces of the security pie and hope to meet Wall Street’s appetite for improved numbers quarter over quarter. This is a time to dominate the network security space and leverage that dominance in the network; not the desktop, not the data, not physical security, not the server, not the data center- the network.
Here is my unsolicited advice. To be heeded only if you have the goal of dramatically increasing Check Point’s presence within the enterprise, doubling revenue in less than five years, and opening market opportunities measurable in the billions of dollars.
First and foremost, the operations and corporate administration of CheckPoint Software must move to the United States. That may be tough to swallow but the location of a corporate headquarters location is not a lifestyle decision, it is a business decision. Strategy and operations must be guided from this headquarters. While your current office location in Northern California is ideal the ultimate location of your headquarters could be influenced by acting on my next piece of advice.
Check Point firewalls must be hardware appliances. The current model of giving away half the revenue of a firewall sale and most of the support revenue has been demonstrated to be a market share loser. Yes, you enjoy enviable margins as a software-only company but it has been at the expense of giving up market share. It may not be too late to develop your own hardware platform but I would advise that this market cannot wait. Check Point should acquire an existing platform that is already successful in supporting FW-1, your flag ship product. Check Point must own the platform in order to execute on the rest of my advice.
After investing the capital in a hardware acquisition there is work to be done. You have to maintain your existing channel while you cut prices, increase partner margins, and introduce new product configurations and support. There are four segments in the network security arena: enterprise gateway, enterprise core, SME and carriers. Across all of these segments your products need a major overhaul. They must be capable of processing entire packets and even sessions at speeds that exceed what your current products do with just packet headers. You will have to OEM your technology to other manufacturers in a tactical move to curtail the number of companies eroding your share in the small office/home office.
I am slowly converting my office Firefox. I looked at the owners PC, a PBX techs PC and they had upgraded...- Anonymous
Comments (5)
NO TECHNOLOGY SUPERIORITY: ARE YOU KIDDING ME.By Anonymous on September 5, 2007, 5:27 amHere is a simple fact. CHECKPOINT INVENTED STATEFUL INSPECTION. This is the technology that ALL firewalls are based on. How about CLusterXL, one of their most...
Reply | Read entire comment
Stiennen slams Check Point....By Anonymous on March 5, 2007, 8:33 pmAnd then joins Fortinet (Check Point competitor) a month later. Hey Network World do you see a conflict of interest here? How about sharing that juicy tidbit with...
Reply | Read entire comment
The obvious question is:By ArkanoiD on January 8, 2007, 5:27 pmWhy Checkpoint? They never had any technology superiority, just clerver marketing. Cyberguard and Juniper outperfrom them.
Reply | Read entire comment
Check PointBy Anonymous on January 4, 2007, 11:01 pmI agree with both viewpoints. However as another former employee believe that Check Point although it should, will never move to the US. It is a pride of made in...
Reply | Read entire comment
Wake up call: An Open Letter to Gil Shwed, CEO of Check Point SoftwareBy Anonymous on December 11, 2006, 9:26 pmAs a fomer employee of Check Point, in the Australia office concur with your comments. Doubt based on my limited experience of them that they will listen, stubbornness...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments