- BlackBerry Storm vs. the iPhone
- 2008 IT industry graveyard
- Top 10 worst uses for Windows
- Economic crisis means double duty for IT pros
- BlackBerry Storm, RIM's first touchscreen device, rolls in
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Test your Web Filter | Value of WDS
If you are a Mac or Linux user and need to run an application that works only on Microsoft operating systems in theory, you have a number of options. But Microsoft has decided to make some of the options harder, or at least more expensive, than they should be.
Using security as an excuse, Microsoft, in its infinite semiwisdom, decided awhile back to dictate what versions of Vista can be run in a virtualized environment. The main result of Microsoft's restrictions may just be to drive such users away from Vista entirely.
Let's say you are a Mac user but need to run Microsoft Visio. If you go out and buy a legal copy of Windows XP, you can run it on your hardware and run Visio on it. To do this, you can use Apple Boot Camp or set your Linux box up for dual boot. But this is far from ideal, because you cannot use the Mac or Linux applications you normally use at the same time as you are using Visio.
A better way to run Visio on a Mac would be to use a virtualization support package, such as Parallels or VMware. This is better in the sense that you get both your Mac and Windows applications on the screen at the same time in different windows. You can even cut and paste between them. Legally you can do this with Windows XP but, as I pointed out last year, Microsoft has decided that this is not OK with some versions of Vista. ("In Vista, to license means 'to restrict'").
Under the Vista license, you are not permitted to run the two lowest-cost versions of Vista in virtual environments. According to press reports, Microsoft is claiming that the restriction is to protect you from potential security problems. I guess Microsoft assumes that if you are rich enough to afford the more expensive version, you are smart enough to avoid the security problems.
Microsoft's decision is likely to get more people to look at a very different approach. A year ago in this column, I said I wanted an approach where Windows applications would just run under the Mac operating system without having to use a full Microsoft operating system ("Will there ever be a corporate Apple?"). Since that column, software to support that approach has become more generally available for Linux and OSX based on the open source Wine package.
A version of Wine for OSX on Intel processors can be found at the Darwine Web site. I've just started to play with it, and it seems to do what is needed.
Partner Content
CA Network & Voice Resource Center
Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.
CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center
Managing Voice Over IP for Successful Convergence
Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.
Managing VoIP for Successful Convergence
The Changing Face of Network Management
Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution
Download Whitepaper
Comments (1)
Re: Obeying Microsoft: Is Wine the way?By Anonymous on March 2, 2007, 9:34 amWhile "setting up an account" can be annoying (and I refuse to do it if any personal information is required), password management is hardly required, as one simply...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments