- What does Cisco have against Quebec?
- Attrition.org nails another nitwit
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Seven cloud-computing security risks
- 20 great Windows open source projects
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
The Internet has been a spectacular success, due in no small part to the fact that governments and large corporations have done little to limit it.
Some lawmakers support laissez-faire free enterprise, in which content freedom will be restricted by an oligopolistic web of deals. Others support the lesser evil of mandated 'Net neutrality, which would preserve the benefits of today's Internet but inhibit its growth tomorrow. Few seem to realize they can have their regulatory cake and eat it, too.
Internet legislation should preserve radical openness in two areas: Internet bit transport, which is what the laissez-faire proponents are focused on, and Internet content and applications, which is what the 'Net neutrality supporters want to protect. Fortunately, both goals are achievable through a scheme that follows seven policy-design principles:
* 'Net neutrality should be preserved for the "Jeffersonian" part of the Internet. Research, teaching, political discourse, and small-business commerce are supported successfully by today's unmetered bandwidth and unguaranteed QoS. Don't fix what isn't broken.
* In general, content and application providers should be left almost wholly unregulated.
* It's OK to regulate telecom carriers. They are natural oligopolists and are used to it.
* It's OK to charge for high QoS. The "Edisonian" part of the Internet will be stifled without substantial investment; somebody has to pay for it.
* Any payment arrangements between content and application providers and consumer-facing carriers should be formulaic. There should be no scope for negotiation, so bias can't creep in.
* Content and application providers should be allowed to subsidize communication costs. Consumers don't like paying on a bit-by-bit basis; they prefer subscriptions or free or ad-supported models.
* Content and application providers shouldn't have to subsidize communication costs. There should be no business-arrangements requirements limiting innovators from getting started on the Internet.
Tariff rebate passthrough is a policy and regulatory framework that satisfies all these principles. It works as follows:
* Internet service is provided to consumers and small business in QoS tiers.
* Tiering is the only basis allowed for price differentiation.
I am slowly converting my office Firefox. I looked at the owners PC, a PBX techs PC and they had upgraded...- Anonymous
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comment