Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Sprint Nextel vs. 41 nonprofits

'Net Buzz By Paul McNamara , Network World , 05/10/2007
McNamara
Newsletter Signup
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Here's an interesting story about a David vs. Goliath dispute over wireless spectrum -- interesting in part because it isn't at all clear that we should be rooting for David.

The issue involves the 2495MHz to 2690MHz band, better known as home of the Educational Broadband Service (EBS). In a nutshell: Sprint Nextel has unleashed the legal hounds in an effort to get the FCC to stop accommodating, or, depending on your point of view, mollycoddling, 41 school districts and other nonprofit organizations that have failed to renew their EBS spectrum licenses before they expired. The FCC has made a practice of granting unofficial grace periods to such organizations, in some cases multiple times and even after the spectrum has been reassigned to another nonprofit.

The online publication eSchool News has a genuinely fair and balanced account of the dispute, although it's a 1,700-word read and you need to register to get beyond the first third. So, we'll provide the CliffsNotes version here:

Now, admit it, you're already suspecting that Sprint Nextel simply wants to grab the expired spectrum licenses for its own purposes, because, well, that's the type of behavior we've come to expect from corporations. However, the carrier insists that's not the case -- going so far as to say, "There is absolutely no scenario under which [Sprint] could directly own any portion of EBS spectrum," and offers a relatively compelling argument that it is simply trying to ensure the rights of those organizations that buy lapsed licenses so that the EBS works as it is supposed to work.

Which isn't to say that Sprint doesn't have a tangible stake in the matter.

From the eSchool News article: "Sprint argues that allowing schools and other nonprofit license-holders to let their licenses lapse without threat of forfeiture sets a legal precedent that could impede the right of legitimate license-holders to use the spectrum effectively, but [critics] say the company's aggressive tactics are insensitive and fail to take into account the difficult circumstances under which educational institutions -- particularly rural schools -- operate."

Anyone who knows anything about how schools operate can understand the point that keeping track of wireless spectrum license-renewal requirements is the type of task that might fall through the cracks/gaping crevices.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (3)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Just follow the rules.By Jason Shamroski on May 15, 2007, 10:13 amHere is just another case of bending the rules or not enforcing them. We are all expected to follow rules - paying taxes, speed limits, renewing drivers license,...

Reply | Read entire comment

Why couldn't they negotiate a deal with the company?By A. Yinger on May 14, 2007, 10:38 pmSince the licensed (EBS) spectrum would default back to the FCC, wouldn't it behoove Sprint to just negotiate with them to begin with? Since I imagine most of this...

Reply | Read entire comment

Sprint Nextel vs. 41 non-profits: Corporate bullying or good network citizenship?By Paul McNamara on May 7, 2007, 2:31 pmHere's an interesting story about a David vs. Goliath dispute over wireless spectrum - interesting in part because it isn't at all clear that we should be...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed