- What does Cisco have against Quebec?
- Attrition.org nails another nitwit
- Diary of a deliberately spammed housewife
- Seven cloud-computing security risks
- 20 great Windows open source projects
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
I’ve long argued that any company providing telecom services -- whether infrastructure-based or VoIP-only -- should assume all the associated responsibilities of a telecom provider, including providing E911 services.
That perspective didn’t win me a lot of friends. Plenty of folks felt I was evidencing a dismaying lack of support for emerging disruptive technologies such as VoIP, and being oh-so-last century in my outmoded insistence that 911 services still mattered.
Well, they’re half-right. I don’t buy the “you’re failing to support emerging technologies” argument. Frankly, I don’t see why anyone should feel that his or her job is to “support” particular technologies (unless, of course, the person works for a vendor). For the rest of us, let the market decide -- may the best technology win.
And if the market’s regulated, rules should be technology-agnostic. A telecom provider using TDM shouldn’t be required to provide services that a VoIP-based provider can wriggle out of. If you want to provide the services, abide by the rules -- or find another business.
Moreover, these rules exist for a reason: We need a way for individuals in trouble to call for help. And folks who are incapacitated by trauma (or too young, too old or speak a different language) should be located automatically. Amusingly, one of my sharper critics was later a first-time user of 911 -- and was amazed at how effectively it worked.
Duh. That’s the point, folks -- E911 ensures that when you need help, it can get to you. And sacrificing that decades-old capability in the name of supporting particular technologies is stupid and shortsighted.
That said, it’s worth assessing the current model for E911 services and asking: Is this really the best we can do in the 21st century?
The answer clearly is "no." Telco providers of all shapes and sizes can and should be doing a lot more when it comes to providing emergency services .
So my critics are right on one point: E911 is a very 20th century approach to a 21st century problem. Carriers are uniquely positioned to proactively advise large populations of emergencies -- yet they’re not really taking advantage of these abilities.
A few weeks back, Network World reported on a service rolling out in Japan that automatically alerts cell phone users to impending earthquakes. That’s great, but it’s just a start. Think about it: what if your cell phone could warn you about traffic accidents or the homicidal escaped prisoner loose in your neighborhood?
superantispywarepro will clean that for you!- Anon
Partner Content
The Foundry Enterprise Advantage
Foundry Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: FDRY) is a leading provider of high-performance enterprise and service provider switching, routing, security and Web traffic management solutions. Foundry's customers include the world's premier ISPs, metro service providers, and enterprises.
For further information on Foundry Networks please click here.
Leveraging the Advantages
of a Multi-vendor Network Strategy
Today's enterprise network provides more than simply a technology infrastructure. It's an enabler for the enterprise, supporting mission critical applications, creating operational efficiencies and increasing productivity gains. Foundry Networks provides the ideal foundation for a multi-vendor network.
Click here to view whitepaper!
Comment