- 595 immigrants arrested at electronics plant
- Techiest celebrity endorsements
- Network failure delays flights across U.S.
- Alcatel-Lucent intros Gigabit Ethernet switches
- Firefox browser gets security boost
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
This article was contributed by a reader. If you have an opinion or technology experience you would like to share, contact Online Community Editor Julie Bort (jbort@nww.com).
Enterprise network professionals take note: If you are considering doubling the size of your flexible-spending medical account to buy more Ibuprofen, antacid and sleep aids, I’ve got news for you. None of these is a cure for the curdled stomach and throbbing head caused by this dreaded message: “The network is down.” Knowing that the message is not true 99.9x% of the time is not the cure either.
As the director responsible for the enterprise network of a midsized healthcare organization, I can sympathize. Our telecommunication technology department services a converged network for data, voice, video and physical security access control. The network spans 25 buildings in a 40-mile circumference linked over private fiber. During the hurricane seasons of 2005 and 2006, our small town took three direct hits. But we experienced no loss of network services.
Our network is completing the fourth major upgrade in 15 years. Yes, we have more sites and more users, but that’s not the only reason driving us to move from 10M to 10G. We also are upgrading because inefficient applications have helped create a fivefold increase in chatty broadcast traffic, which now comprises 25% of all network traffic. While network devices have become more efficient at processing packets, applications and operating systems have not.
Now, I ask: Should network departments continue to increase bandwidth or take on network application optimization to compensate for poorly written code? I believe the best solution is for IT departments to demand that developers of operating systems, applications, hosts and end devices provide more efficient products.
With the move to Intel-based server/hosts and personal computers, somehow the network got stuck with the expectation of compensating for Microsoft’s operating systems. The MS OS is used in the mainstream while bugs continue to be found and patched. Before the fix process is complete, a new OS release will force the process to begin again. Is there any enterprise network that has not been down because of a DOS attack propagated by poorly patched PCs or Servers? A manufacturer of network equipment would not survive with a level of bug patching equal to Microsoft’s.
Partner Content
NetScout is one of the world's premier providers of integrated network and application performance solutions.
www.netscout.com
Know First
Get Proactive — Move from Troubleshooting to Monitoring to Management with nGenius K2's Service Dashboard & Intelligent Early Warning Alarms
Watch the Video
Know Where
Get Rapid Performance Problem Isolation with nGenius Performance Manager and Diagnose Problems up to 70% Faster!
Learn More
Know Why
Get the Details to Validate and Solve your Toughest Performance Issues with nGenius InfiniStream and Sniffer Intelligence Modules
Read the Whitepaper
Comments (5)
Response - Our work can help other companiesBy David Rosicke on July 19, 2007, 2:26 pmBernie, most of our tools are nearly 10 years old or are free. We purchase WebNM, HP OpenView, and a couple of Wireless tools. The rest are relics in this day...
Reply | Read entire comment
Comment, our work can help other companiesBy Bernie Lubitz on July 16, 2007, 2:40 pmDavid, it's great that you have the funds and the cooperation to run such a clean network. Unfortunately, not all Network Groups receive such favorable acceptance...
Reply | Read entire comment
Your Comment on The Biggest LieBy Bernie Lubitz on July 16, 2007, 2:33 pmMark, your comments are on right on the money. Telecommunication carriers have a rough go of attempting to meet the clients unrealistic expectations. I particularly...
Reply | Read entire comment
Our work can help other companiesBy David Rosicke on July 16, 2007, 12:24 pmAfter reviewing this Network World article, I realized that Hartford Hospital's work to keep the network 'clean' should set standards for other companies. We...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Biggest lie in the enterprise: 'The network is down'By Anonymous on July 12, 2007, 1:00 pmThe article by Bernie Lubitz speaks directly to what we see each day. Re: Biggest lie in the enterprise: 'The network is down'. N-tier applications work just...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments