- Windows HPC hits top 10 among supercomputers
- Ruby on Rails rolls into the enterprise
- Mobile phone chargers are energy vampires
- 10 IT security companies to watch
- Researchers getting the lead out of electronics
Early in my network career I had to explain to my boss why we needed head-end routers in the data center. Coming from an application background, he didn’t understand data connectivity and thought the packets somehow went directly into the mainframe through the “ether” net I kept talking about. Somehow I survived that career-challenging meeting and adequately explained basic network connectivity in a way that allowed me to keep my job and purchase the needed routers.
Looking back, there were times when it seemed that there was some magic to data connectivity. Our ability to access files and resources on a computer in another part of the world over telephone lines caused many people to call us network wizards. And with a lexicon of magical terms such as DECNet, TCP/IP, SNA, NetBEUI, ASCII and IPX, we conjured up connectivity solutions that verged on miraculous (it was often a miracle they worked at all!). However, after 22 years of “conjuring,” I can safely say there is nothing magical about networks — with the possible exception of IPv4.
By all reports, IPv4 should be dead. Its limited address space, antiquated security and lack of native authentication mechanisms have generated multitudes of obituaries by industry pundits who proclaimed the new era of IPv6. According to the Merlins of Internet connectivity, IPv6 was required for the widespread adoption of VoIP, B2B extranets, and secure Internet connectivity.
After years of defending IPv4, I finally caved into the overwhelming evidence being provided by industry analysts, Internet experts and my own engineering staff. With arms wide open I stood ready to embrace the future and begin migrating my networks to IPv6.
And now two years later, my arms have grown tired of waiting for something to embrace; my engineering staff has moved on to other jobs; and my network is supporting VoIP, IPSec, SSL, extranets, intranets secure remote access and everything else with antiquated IPv4.
My IPv4 network-addressable devices are increasing daily, stricter security requirements are being mandated monthly, business-critical voice and data applications are being deployed weekly. I’m communicating with external devices that use the same 10.0.0.0 address space that my networks use, and my NAT appliances are not the traffic bottlenecks they were forecasted to be. How can that be?
Partner Content
NetScout and analyst Jim Metzler have teamed to deliver a series of IT Briefs on Network and Application Performance Management leveraging research from NetScout’s nGenius & Sniffer users.
www.netscout.com
Metzler on CIO Priorities
The top five CIO priorities based on a survey of NetScout users revealing CIOs' top priorities and what they think they should be. Also includes interviews with CIOs of large organizations.
Read the Report
Metzler on Application Delivery
How to eliminate the stovepiped or siloed nature of application delivery from both an organization and a technological perspective.
Read the Brief
Metzler on Network Troubleshooting
Overview of network troubleshooting that provides an assessment of where we are, and where we need to be relative to the complexities of today's IT challenges.
Read the Brief
Comments (1)
RE: The Magic of IPv4By Tom Franciosi on August 15, 2007, 12:23 pmI was shocked at how basic communication testing was being done on the Moonv6 project in this week's Network World article "Is IPv6 ready for the office?"....
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments