Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Unified communications - battle royal

Tolly on Technology By Kevin Tolly , Network World , 08/28/2007
Tolly
  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

For me the recent VoiceCon show in San Francisco gave new meaning to the words "unified messaging." As I made my rounds to close to two dozen analyst meetings, almost every executive was focused on laying out their company's "Unified Communications" strategy and/or its upper-stack cousin, "Communications-enabled Business Processes." UC and CEBP were certainly the stars of the show but how we'll get there is not at all clear and a big battle is brewing.

IP telephony battles of recent years have, naturally, been between the long-standing PBX vendors - Alcatel, Avaya, Nortel, Siemens -- and the "new" VoIP vendors - Cisco, Shoretel and a string of others. Now, with its Office Communications Server 2007, Microsoft is arriving in a big way and has big plans to take over IP telephony, er, sorry, unified communications.

In an hour-long product commercial, apparently mislabeled as a keynote speech in the event program, a Microsoft executive spoke in detail of how the aforementioned OCS 2007 and the client-counterpart Office Communicator 2007 would, essentially, eliminate the need for old, 'hardware-based" systems. Meaning, in essence, anything sold by anyone other than Microsoft.

As I sat there, I couldn't help but remind myself that there is really no such thing as a "hardware-based" PBX any more. Years ago, PBX systems did run proprietary software usually on proprietary hardware but those days are over. The "traditional" vendors have all ported the most important system elements to run on open hardware and OS platforms. All offer "soft phones" that run on popular PC clients and VoIP "hardware" phones are more software than hardware.

As it happened, my next meeting after this session was with executives from Avaya. When I asked them if Microsoft's PBX-elimination strategy concerned them, they said it did not. Why? Because they believe that CEBP will trump unified communications. To explain: Where unified communications provides integration of "general" functions — like being able to call someone by clicking on their name in Outlook — CEBP will provide a more significant value add.

CEBP, Avaya and others say, will allow communications tools to be directly integrated into business processes. Avaya's example (and another keynote topic) was Black and Decker. CEBP (from Avaya) allows the company to use text-to-speech to allow computers instead of people call out to customers whose products have been repaired and are ready for pickup.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content
Foundry Networks

The Foundry Enterprise Advantage

Foundry Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: FDRY) is a leading provider of high-performance enterprise and service provider switching, routing, security and Web traffic management solutions. Foundry's customers include the world's premier ISPs, metro service providers, and enterprises.

For further information on Foundry Networks please click here.

Leveraging the Advantages
of a Multi-vendor Network Strategy

Today's enterprise network provides more than simply a technology infrastructure. It's an enabler for the enterprise, supporting mission critical applications, creating operational efficiencies and increasing productivity gains. Foundry Networks provides the ideal foundation for a multi-vendor network.

Click here to view whitepaper!

Comments (3)
Login
Forgot your account info?

VoiceCon PodcastBy Anonymous on September 18, 2007, 11:22 amFor more on Unified Communications and Voice VoiceCon and Unified Communications Podcast

Reply | Read entire comment

Article ReferenceBy Kevin W. Tolly on August 31, 2007, 1:43 pmReference is not to a film but to the ancient Roman term -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_royal. Glad that you liked the column.

Reply | Read entire comment

RE: Unified communications - battle royalBy Anonymous on August 29, 2007, 12:44 pmGreat article, questionable analogy to the "Battle Royal" movie though.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed

Latest News

rssRss Feed