Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

3Com joins the list of one-generation companies

Yankee Ingenuity By Howard Anderson , Network World , 10/30/2007
Howard Anderson
Newsletter Signup
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

It was with some degree of sadness that I saw 3Com sold to Bain Capital and Huawei. But it got me wondering why we see so many one-generation companies.

Think of it: Network Equipment Technologies, 3Com, Novell, Palm, Ciena, Cascade, Ascend, Newbridge and the list goes on. Yes, I know that some were merged and some still exist in diminished state, but for all of them, their moment in the sun is over.

The same pretty much holds on the computer side of the house: Burroughs, Univac, NCR, Control Data, Amdahl, Honeywell.

My friend Clay Christensen from the Harvard Business School was a guest lecturer at my class at MIT last week and the subject came up. (“What’s the difference between Harvard and MIT students? MIT students have better brains; Harvard students have better haircuts.”) I mentioned that every CEO at 3Com was a friend of mine and all were seemingly competent managers — so was it just bad luck, bad karma or bad management that kills once successful network technology companies?

Was it the fact that they had turned from a company run by technologists to one where the guiding force was the ongoing demands of financial results?

Clay’s answer: It was precisely because they were well run that they failed. At best, only one company in 10 sustains profitable growth by internal means, but capital markets demand growth and profitable growth — and punish those that do not execute.

Because they are well run, they religiously abort the disruptive potential of new ideas before they see the light of day.

So what is the answer? Manage less well? Set up stand-alone subsidiaries to compete with the mother ship? Most companies find their internal growth slowing and then start to do financial engineering, buying firms with a rapid trajectory, hoping these companies will turbocharge the entire organization.

This usually works for a while, and then the whole thing blows up when the upstarts begin to crater. Evidence: Look at all the acquisitions that Lucent and Nortel made.

3Com tried. It bought Tipping Point, which is a young powerhouse in secure converged networks; It bought out Huawei’s 2% minority share in its joint venture. But in the end, the company threw in the towel, selling out to Bain and Huawei.

Turning a company on a downward spiral is the single hardest job in American industry, and 3Com has been on a downward spiral seemingly forever. It remains to be seen what the Boys From Bain can do.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

NetScout and analyst Jim Metzler have teamed to deliver a series of IT Briefs on Network and Application Performance Management leveraging research from NetScout's nGenius & Sniffer users.

www.netscout.com

Metzler on Service Delivery Management

Delivering IT business value by evolving our thinking from managing application performance to focusing on services.

Learn More

2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Successful IT organizations must know how to make the right application delivery decisions in these tough economic times.

Download the Handbook

Metzler on the Modern IP Network

Discusses the growing emphasis on network management and the need to implement a holistic view of the end-to-end experience of the user.

Read the Brief

Comments (1)
Login
Forgot your account info?

RE: 3Com joins the list of one-generation companiesBy Bill Baker on November 1, 2007, 1:11 pmGreat article and a great observation but it omitted to also highlight how flawed are (were) the BoDs at each of the aforementioned companies. BoDs in technology-centric...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed