- Is the Cisco MARS mission going to abort?
- First iPhone worm spreads Rick Astley wallpaper
- 10 stunning 3D buildings made with Google SketchUp
- Open source software ready for big business
- Four reasons to buy (and one reason to avoid) the Droid
Last week I began to discuss MojoPac from RingCube, which uses operating system virtualization to create a Windows XP virtual machine on a host PC running XP.
Virtualizing the operating system rather than the hardware results in big performance gains. RingCube claims hardware virtualization overhead can be as high as 40% of processor cycles, while the MojoPac operating system virtualization has an overhead of about 0.4%. The company also claims a low memory overhead -- about 30MB compared with hardware virtualization, which starts at around 1GB.
MojoPac, in effect, shares the host operating system. This not only means you can run games from a MojoPac system, but it also gets around licensing problems because there is only one copy of the host operating system. Sorry Bill.
When a MojoPac system is running you are either in the MojoPac environment or in the host environment. Whichever you are in occupies the whole display, although programs running in both environments continue to execute and you have full clipboard sharing.
I mentioned last week that MojoPac requires administrator access to run. If this level of privilege isn’t possible, RingCube now has a tool called Usher that, once installed, allows MojoPac to run with whatever privileges the current user has.
Last week I referred to the MojoPac product that runs off USB-interfaced devices as “MojoPac” — this has recently been rebranded as “MojoDrive.”
MojoDrive is marketed under the banner of Enterprise MojoPac, a suite of virtualization solutions that also includes MojoStation. MojoStation is like MojoDrive but can be installed in a local hard-disk subdirectory, allowing for much improved performance.
Even more interesting is that with RingCube’s configuration tool, MojoAdmin, you can create installers for your own pre-configured and locked-down versions of MojoDrive and MojoStation.
For example, you could build an installer that creates a MojoDrive or MojoStation that requires a name and password to install, when running disables switching back to the host operating system, doesn’t allow new applications to be installed, requires authentication against Active Directory, blocks printing on the host’s printers, disables print screen and clipboard sharing, and requires host antispyware and antivirus software.
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comments (3)
A couple bones to pick on virtualizationBy Peter Thornton on December 10, 2007, 12:36 pmFirst of all, I had a problem with your definition of 'emulation' versus virtualization. If you create a complete virtual machine in software, then it is a simulation....
Reply | Read entire comment
Re: A couple bones to pick on virtualizationBy Mark Gibbs on December 14, 2007, 4:38 pmRegarding “simulate” and “emulate”: If you look up the words you will find they are synonymous (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/simulate and http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/emulate...
Reply | Read entire comment
The simulation vs emulation distinction wasn't just UnivacBy Anonymous on December 14, 2007, 4:45 pmAll the vendors used it - especially IBM. I was amused by the idea that Wikipedia might be a reference for a 1970s computing environment. However, in that spirit,...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments