- 10 open source companies to watch
- Mythbuster busts his own tale
- $208 million petascale computer gets green light
- Sony recalls 73,000 Vaio laptops
- Chrome and Firefox and add-ons
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
There is nothing we industry pundits love more than a good food fight. Cisco vs. Lucent. Google vs. Microsoft! Intel vs. AMD! Cable vs. Satellite! SAP vs. Oracle! But the Fight of The Future is what is going to happen on your cellular phone and in your home.
A few years ago I was invited to Bill Gates’ home for dinner (“Howard, you shameless name-dropper! I bet you were there because Bill needed another waiter or two”) and since Bill is not real good at small talk (“How ‘bout them SuperSonics!”), I adroitly moved the conversation to how he had wired his $70-plus million home. The issue was just how much bandwidth did The Home of The Future Need? Two Megabits? Six? Bill was quite comfortable talking about…. 100 megabits to the home. 100 Megabits!
After all these years, we know four universal truths about networks. One, they always grow. Two, they always get more complex. Three, the amount and form of content expands to fill the amount of ever increasing bandwidth. And lastly, the cost of bandwidth drops even quicker than Moore’s Law.
On one hand, pulling fiber to homes is the brute-force method. Dollars in, megabits out. It is relatively easy to build new big pipes – throw money at the problem. This is the Verizon strategy. Kind of like replicating the nation’s highway system so that you have a superhighway to everyone’s front door.
There is another way: mathematics. New compression algorithms actually reduce the amount of data needed by eliminating redundancy. So both trends work in concert to continue to cut the cost per bit of bandwidth.
Until about three years ago, it was assumed that the home or consumer might, just might, need high speed in, but never did people think that we would need high speed out. I mean, what were we, broadcasters? Yes, we are. We started by broadcasting e-mail, then we did pictures, then we did video. We were both a source and a sync of signal. And then we wanted to do it…. Wirelessly. Of course we did. CNN has a new service where TV subscribers upload their video to CNN headquarters – which rebroadcasts to the world. There is even a site (youporn.com) where amateurs upload their “home movies”; this site is actually wrecking the business of the adult DVD business – it is “YouTube” for the horny masses. Don’t laugh (but its all right to snicker).

This comprehensive, 115 page guide provides frontline network troubleshooters with practical advice...
File Integrity Monitoring: Secure Your Virtual and Physical IT EnvironmentsDiscover the capabilities your file integrity monitoring solution should have to effectively secure...
Realizing the Potential of User-Generated and Social NetworkingCan communication service providers (CSPs) leverage Web 2.0 services and create new service...

The standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...
Intelligent Mobility: BlackBerry Technical Seminar 2008The virtual BlackBerry Technical Seminar keeps growing in popularity every year, and we want to...
Harnessing the power of communications to increase workplace performanceDue to the convergence of IT and telecommunications technologies, the business workplace has been...

WAN Ethernet services are reliable, cost-efficient offerings that are widely available and in a...
Comments (1)
RE: Google vs the telcos: the new industry Food FightBy Dr Bob Hacker on December 17, 2007, 11:09 amKudos for a Very interesting piece! There are a couple of relevant points that come to mind: 1. Fiber has been the cheapest way to go on a 10-year basis since...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments