- Insider threat looms large in San Francisco
- Woman fired over death threat
- IT admin pleads not guilty
- Tape storage gets more dense
- Top 10 worst uses for Windows
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
I cannot remember the last time that the mainstream press took notice of any equipment vendor announcing a software development kit, but clearly Apple is not just any equipment vendor and the iPhone SDK is not just any SDK. The SDK that Apple just announced provides more functionality and fewer rules than some observers expected, but has still generated some justifiable and not-so-justifiable complaints.
The first news story I saw about the SDK announcement focused on Apple’s planned inclusion of Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync and other business-friendly features in the next release of the iPhone’s software. It only mentioned the SDK in passing as a way that third-party software developers would be able to create software for business customers. The general thrust of this as well as a number of other stories was: Watch out BlackBerry, Apple is coming.
Later the same day the predominant theme was that developers were enthusiastic about the potential offered by the SDK but were annoyed by some restrictions, such as only distributing the software through iTunes and no VoIP over the cellular network. By the next day many stories started to focus on the contractual limitations, including no background processes, no use of unpublished API features and no use of plug-ins.
None of the stories I saw talked about what I think is the most important aspect of the SDK -- Apple is admitting that the iPhone is a computer running a good operating system -- the very thing I pined for a few months back (read "Apple’s iPhone -- not the home of the free").
Some restrictions that have been talked about make sense. It is hard to see that Apple or its partner telcos have much desire to enable telco bypass over the telco networks. So it’s hard to see that anyone who thought about it should have been surprised that VoIP over the cellular network is contractually prohibited. But it is a bit surprising that VoIP over the Wi-Fi net was noted at the announcement as specifically not being prohibited. This means that an iPod Touch will quickly become a phone of choice for people who tend to work, live or stay in Wi-Fi-rich environments (like the Holiday Inn Express I’m writing this column in). Another restriction that may turn out not to be as strict as it looked at first glance clearly makes sense as a best practice -- you do not want lots of applications running in the background running down the battery. And, I fully expect that Apple will announce a way for enterprises to run their own iTunes-like servers for software distribution.
Intel...I guarantee you will never ever see a customer using Wimax the way it was laid out by Intel 6...- Anonymous
Partner Content
CA Network & Voice Resource Center
Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.
CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center
Managing Voice Over IP for Successful Convergence
Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.
Managing VoIP for Successful Convergence
The Changing Face of Network Management
Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution
Download Whitepaper
Comment