- Insider threat looms large in San Francisco
- Woman fired over death threat
- IT admin pleads not guilty
- Tape storage gets more dense
- Top 10 worst uses for Windows
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Just imagine if one day in the near future the FBI comes to your enterprise with warrants that allow them to seize and remove any computer-related equipment, utility bills, telephone bills, any addressed correspondence sent through the U.S. mail, video gear, camera equipment, checkbooks, bank statements and credit card statements. The first question you’d ask is, “Who has done what?”
You’re going to be presume your CEO has been involved in some outrageous stock manipulation, or maybe your CFO has been cooking the books. But no, the agent in charge says: “Someone here clicked on a Web link and we’re going to find out who did it.”
A link?! Clicking on a link can now be a federal offense?! Was it a link to the truth about JFK’s assassination (which we all know the CIA was responsible for . . . or was it the Moonies?). Was the link going to launch an ICBM at the Kremlin? Nope, it was a link to a nonexistent cache of kiddie porn that was created specifically by the FBI to attract pedophiles.
As is often said at moments like these, I am not making this up; this is exactly what happened to a doctoral student at Temple University who was also a history professor at La Salle University named Roderick Vosburgh. FBI agents knocked on Vosburgh’s door early one evening and proceeded to throw him to the ground before cuffing him. Sounds a little heavy-handed, but who knows, he could have been armed with a RAZR for all they knew.
According to federal law, attempts to download child porn, whether successful or not, can result in prison sentences of up to 10 years, and a court found Vosburgh guilty of just that, “attempting” to follow a link, a link set up specially by the FBI to trap pedophiles.
Now, this is interesting for a number of reasons that should worry all of us in the IT industry. First, there’s the issue of intent. It turns out that by simply accessing one of these links you are de facto, presumed guilty by your IP address being the proximate cause.
The fact that the action might not have been done by you personally is, apparently, not an issue. This makes running an open Wi-Fi access point completely inadvisable. And when your friends come over and ask to check their e-mail, the answer has got to be “no.” And you’d better have in-depth Internet filtering for your kids.
Intel...I guarantee you will never ever see a customer using Wimax the way it was laid out by Intel 6...- Anonymous
Partner Content
Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint
www.sophos.com
Stopping data leakage
Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.
Download the white paper.
Why detection rates aren't enough
Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask to prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.
Download the white paper.
Unauthorized applications: Taking back control
Employees installing and using unauthorized applications like IM, VoIP, games and peer-to-peer file-sharing applications cause many businesses serious concern. How do you control these applications?
Download the white paper.
Comments (8)
And they're probablyBy Mark Gibbs on May 7, 2008, 4:43 pmAnd they're probably monitoring your email and telephones right now ... what's that noise outside?
Reply | Read entire comment
Makes ya think - and not in a good wayBy Brad on May 7, 2008, 4:42 pmYour article that the FBI can break into someone's house or business and destroy their life, without knowing for sure if they actually went intentionally to a child...
Reply | Read entire comment
My biggest worry is at homeBy Eric Tovias on May 7, 2008, 11:52 amCorporate-wise, I would have to think that minimizing corporate risk is job number one. Establishing an acceptable use policy and educating employees on the law...
Reply | Read entire comment
Damn Right I Can... for a long time now...By Anonymous on May 1, 2008, 5:17 pmAs Henry Bowman, in _Unintended Consequences_ by John Ross asks [as part of a term paper he writes in the 'story line']... "The Great Question is... at what point...
Reply | Read entire comment
Latest excuse to grab more of our privacyBy Don Radick on April 30, 2008, 12:29 pmWe have given up huge portions (maybe all) of our privacy to the federal government. Not even sure why. In the 80's the excuse was "narco-terrorists" In the...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments