- Palm unwraps the unlocked 3G Treo Pro
- FTC targets prerecorded telemarketing drivel
- New algorithm offers hope for old routers
- Microsoft hires Seinfeld to bite Apple
- 'White space' spectrum debate to get hotter
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Twenty five years ago, when I was running The Yankee Group and had just co-founded Battery Ventures, I would take perverse joy in getting one industry into the pants of another. Mischief City!
My finest evil moment was when I would speak at the National Cable Television Association Executive Meeting and tell the cable
yahoos how to get into the telephone business . . . and then run over to AT&T/RBOCs and tell them they absolutely positively had to get into cable television ("..and those guys are planning on getting
into telephony! Do you want your lunch eaten? No? Well, let me tell you what you should do!").
Each lusted after the other’s market and each won black belts in spending by building out infrastructure. And those of us
backing young infrastructure companies got rich when the arms merchants (equipment suppliers) kept bidding up the price of
things like cable modems.
Of course you would have to have your head examined to actually trust the cable company to deliver voice or the telephone
company to mess with your HBO subscription. Triple Play, my rear. More like Triple Witching Hour. And when it came to the
Internet, it really didn’t matter -- you could get horrible service from either one.
Cablevision Systems won the Boston cable franchise by bidding $2/month! Warner Amex won the Pittsburgh franchise by having
two-way interactive cable where once in an exhibition football game, you could vote on whether the quarterback should pass
or run on the next play!
About 18 months ago, I started having a feud with Comcast, the successor to Cablevision. Was this payback time? Was someone in Philadelphia remembering that it is better to get even
than get mad? All of a sudden, my signal was degraded; I would find suddenly my screen went blank or it would go to pagination.
Every time the repair person came out . . . it was always my problem, never theirs. That’s right, blame the victim.
So we stopped paying the bill. No service, no payment. But the billing department and the service departments communicated
mainly by rumor. Brian (last name unknown to whom we spoke often at Comcast) said, "We know that you have been paying us $100/month
for 10 years, but just pay the past three months unpaid balance and we will decide what to credit you." My response was unprintable.
The newest management theory is called co-creation. It says that customers and vendors should jointly create new products.
So I tried this on Brian at Comcast. "Look, do your best. At the end of the month we can jointly decide what percentage of
what you said you would do, you actually did. If I only got CNN for 10 days and HBO for 15, why don’t we just pay 42% of your bill?
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (1)
Comcast and meBy Jeffrey Fritz on June 18, 2008, 10:20 amWhat you wrote was eerily familiar. I went through much the same song and dance with Comcast myself in San Francisco. Their HD feed was regularly terrible with...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments