- Mythbuster busts his own tale
- 10 open source companies to watch
- Sony recalls 73,000 Vaio laptops
- Tool to evade China's Web censorship
- Chrome and Firefox and add-ons
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
We love it when Batman defeats the Joker because we love to see the bad guys get their just desserts. But as enjoyable as it is seeing fictional villains lose, it's far more satisfying when the bad guys get their comeuppance in real life. This is what just happened in a small but hopefully decisive way to the infamous Santa Cruz Operation.
For the last five years SCO has been on a quest to undermine the legal foundations of Linux. Over that period I've written about SCO's progress several times – the last was at the end of October 2007, in a column titled (rather cleverly if I say so myself) “Look out! It's FrankenSCO!”
Quick joke: Little Jimmy told his father he wanted a cowboy outfit for Christmas so his father bought him SCO.
Anyway, just a month earlier SCO had filed for bankruptcy protection and was running on fumes. Then along came an outfit named York Capital Management (a nom de guerre for JGD Management) that was going to throw SCO a financial life ring to the tune of $36 million.
Alas for SCO that deal was objected to by Novell and IBM (both of which, you will recall, SCO was in litigation with) as well as the Department of Justice's bankruptcy administration agency. Thus it was that SCO had to back out of the deal, and two days after Christmas '07 the company was de-listed from the Nasdaq.
When I wrote the FrankenSCO column I marveled at the sheer audacity of York Capital to want to invest in a business that was based on one of the most brazen scams ever seen in the high-tech world. Little did I know that York was not the only potential investor.
Nope, in the middle of February 2008, SCO announced a proposed deal with Stephen Norris Capital Partners (SNCP) that would give SCO up to $100 million, allowing the company to restructure, exit Chapter 11 and go private. In the process SCO would repay all of its creditors including Novell and IBM, but annoyingly a joint SNCP and SCO press release talked of "see[ing] SCO's legal claims through to their full conclusion." Curiously SNCP pulled out of that deal in April but then turned around and proposed simply buying SCO's assets!
On June 19 SCO got yet another extension (until Aug. 11) to file a bankruptcy reorganization plan with the courts (boo), and on July 16 a court found in Novell's favor and determined that SCO had to cough up $2,547,817 “for unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty.” Hooray! Score one for the good guys.

In this whitepaper learn how Retrospective Network Analysis (RNA) has proved a different type of...
SNMP Monitorin One Critical Component to Network ManagementSNMP is a valuable tool to any network administrator who requires complete visibility into the...
Monitoring and Managing App PerformanceThis paper defines application analysis, discusses the different categories of tools on the market,...

Double-Take (r) Software and Microsoft are teaming up on September 9, 2008 for a webinar focusing...
Transforming the Enterprise WAN Edge: Video from CiscoLife on the edge of your WAN has changed dramatically. With the need to deliver advanced services,...
PoE Plus: Impact on the PoE MarketThe standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...

Archiving, backup and data protection take on ever more critical roles in the enterprise. Data...
The New Network/System Management ChallengesIncreasingly popular technologies such as virtualization, wireless networking and data center...
Virtualization Reality CheckFind out why analysts say approaching virtualization with an ounce of caution is wise. And also why...
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find out more
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost -- and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download the White Paper
Don't Fall For The Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Download the White Paper
Will You Add Tape Too?
Over two thirds of disk-only users look to add tape back into storage infrastructure according to recent survey.
Download Survey Information
Comments (8)
SCO and just dessertsBy Anonymous on July 29, 2008, 1:05 pm..."Could someone please explain how these investors could ignore more-or-less an entire market telling them that the case was unethical, unfounded and untenable..." Um...hello,...
Reply | Read entire comment
Wrong companyBy Anonymous on July 23, 2008, 10:37 pmDon't confuse SCO Group with Santa Cruz Operation.
Reply | Read entire comment
Inadequate Court CloutBy Anonymous on July 18, 2008, 7:14 pmFor certain concerns, investment - back door and otherwise - in SCO's legal wrangles is a cheap way to keep the Linux and general open source communities squirming....
Reply | Read entire comment
Easy, investment companies are playing with money from other peoBy Anonymous on July 18, 2008, 3:22 pmEasy, investment companies are playing with money from other people, so what do they care? Due to their horse blinders, they only see the potential gain, even though...
Reply | Read entire comment
Not quite rightBy Anonymous on July 18, 2008, 1:05 pmThe company suing world+dog over Linux is The SCO Group, not the Santa Cruz Operation, which became Tarantella, which was then was bought by Sun.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments