Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

SCO and just desserts

Backspin By Mark Gibbs , Network World , 07/17/2008
Gibbs
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

We love it when Batman defeats the Joker because we love to see the bad guys get their just desserts. But as enjoyable as it is seeing fictional villains lose, it's far more satisfying when the bad guys get their comeuppance in real life. This is what just happened in a small but hopefully decisive way to the infamous Santa Cruz Operation.

For the last five years SCO has been on a quest to undermine the legal foundations of Linux. Over that period I've written about SCO's progress several times – the last was at the end of October 2007, in a column titled (rather cleverly if I say so myself) “Look out! It's FrankenSCO!”

Quick joke: Little Jimmy told his father he wanted a cowboy outfit for Christmas so his father bought him SCO.

Anyway, just a month earlier SCO had filed for bankruptcy protection and was running on fumes. Then along came an outfit named York Capital Management (a nom de guerre for JGD Management) that was going to throw SCO a financial life ring to the tune of $36 million.

Alas for SCO that deal was objected to by Novell and IBM (both of which, you will recall, SCO was in litigation with) as well as the Department of Justice's bankruptcy administration agency. Thus it was that SCO had to back out of the deal, and two days after Christmas '07 the company was de-listed from the Nasdaq.

When I wrote the FrankenSCO column I marveled at the sheer audacity of York Capital to want to invest in a business that was based on one of the most brazen scams ever seen in the high-tech world. Little did I know that York was not the only potential investor.

Nope, in the middle of February 2008, SCO announced a proposed deal with Stephen Norris Capital Partners (SNCP) that would give SCO up to $100 million, allowing the company to restructure, exit Chapter 11 and go private. In the process SCO would repay all of its creditors including Novell and IBM, but annoyingly a joint SNCP and SCO press release talked of "see[ing] SCO's legal claims through to their full conclusion." Curiously SNCP pulled out of that deal in April but then turned around and proposed simply buying SCO's assets!

On June 19 SCO got yet another extension (until Aug. 11) to file a bankruptcy reorganization plan with the courts (boo), and on July 16 a court found in Novell's favor and determined that SCO had to cough up $2,547,817 “for unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty.” Hooray! Score one for the good guys.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling

Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.

Download whitepaper

Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation

Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.

Download whitepaper

Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video

A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member.  See how in this 2-minute video overview.

Go to video

Comments (8)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Minor errataBy lordshipmayhem on July 17, 2008, 5:31 pmIt wasn't the Royal Bank of Canada itself that was ponying up money for this scam - they were doing so "on behalf of an unnamed client". Not that...

Reply | Read entire comment

Follow the moneyBy shultquist on July 18, 2008, 1:46 amThere has to be some financial windfall behind it, and it's important to ask the question. What are they after? There are NO valid claims in there, and everyone...

Reply | Read entire comment

Unnamed clientBy MarkR on July 18, 2008, 10:06 amIsn't the unnamed client Microsoft or somebody associated with Microsoft? Microsoft is the only one that could gain anything from this lawsuit. They are and have...

Reply | Read entire comment

Not quite rightBy Anonymous on July 18, 2008, 1:05 pmThe company suing world+dog over Linux is The SCO Group, not the Santa Cruz Operation, which became Tarantella, which was then was bought by Sun.

Reply | Read entire comment

Easy, investment companies are playing with money from other peoBy Anonymous on July 18, 2008, 3:22 pmEasy, investment companies are playing with money from other people, so what do they care? Due to their horse blinders, they only see the potential gain, even though...

Reply | Read entire comment

Inadequate Court CloutBy Anonymous on July 18, 2008, 7:14 pmFor certain concerns, investment - back door and otherwise - in SCO's legal wrangles is a cheap way to keep the Linux and general open source communities squirming....

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed