- More porn sneaks onto the iPhone
- 'Swatting' case shows need to ban caller-ID spoofing
- Why the iPhone can't be "killed"
- Nortel enterprise chief wants to bring back Bay
- US sets final emergency responder wireless pilot
As President-elect Barack Obama begins fleshing out his agenda, one promising sign is that he considers Internet infrastructure to be key, judging from both his stated goals and the caliber of people he's asking to advise him on policy.
I couldn't agree more. But before we jump into policy discussions, we should probably agree on some definitions. What, exactly, comprises an ISP? Is it a telco that also offers Internet connectivity? A wireless provider? What about a content provider?
I'm not being pedantic — the answers have far-reaching consequences for policy issues like universal broadband and net neutrality.
Take Amazon, whose Kindle device has transformed my life over the past eight months. For those who don't know, the Kindle's an e-book; a paperback-sized plastic device with a black-and-white display optimized for books and other written material. Its best feature, though, is the ability to deliver books instantaneously (or nearly so) through a free wireless link: Click, download, read.
For folks like me who are addicted to the written word, it's more compelling than caffeine. So Amazon provides the wireless connection, and doesn't charge users for it. (The actual network is Sprint's, but Amazon brands it as "Amazon WhisperNet.")
Here's where it gets interesting, though. This wireless link is actually an Internet connection, which is optimized to take users directly to the Amazon.com Web site. But like any "real" Internet connection, it also supports general-purpose browsing, e-mail and other applications.
In essence, Amazon is now an ISP — taking its place in my household alongside the wireless and cable providers that also deliver Internet connectivity. Yet Amazon's "Internet service" makes it extraordinarily easy to connect to Amazon.com — and extraordinarily cumbersome to get to, say, BarnesandNoble.com.
That is, Amazon's an ISP that unabashedly favors one content source (Amazon) over another (Barnes and Noble). And by doing so it violates the fundamental premise of net neutrality — which is not to prioritize content from source A over content from source B.
You may figure that it's no big deal, because nobody in their right mind would elect to subscribe to the Internet through Amazon. Maybe. But there's a rather compelling logic to "free" — and whether intentionally or not, Amazon has now created the first free coast-to-coast consumer ISP.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (3)
ISP?By Anonymous on November 25, 2008, 6:17 pmTerminology can't be ignored, because it gains the force of legal and regulatory precedent. But for understanding phenomena in order to work together rationally...
Reply | Read entire comment
Intent is the key the author fails to explore in his veiled atteBy Anonymous on November 25, 2008, 5:09 pmIntent is the key the author fails to explore in his veiled attempt to obviate the facts (see SaveTheInternet.org). Even a casual observer knows that Amazon's intent...
Reply | Read entire comment
I completely disagree with this article...By Anonymous on November 25, 2008, 10:56 amI completely disagree with this article. First of all, Amazon is not an ISP. It is an ICP - internet content provider. It does not own the interconnect, fiber and...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments