- New attack fells Internet Explorer
- Steve Jobs is a man of a few words
- Oddball gifts for uber geeks
- Global warming research exposed after hack
- Google adding IPv6 to YouTube
This column is not really about Amazon violating its own terms of service by deleting e-books that its Kindle customers had purchased. Most commentators are painting Amazon's actions as some sort of isolated brain fart, but I think it's not actually an Amazon-specific problem.
Some background: The Amazon terms of use say that the company grants Kindle users "the non-exclusive right to keep a permanent copy" of the e-books they purchase. The terms do not let you resell the e-books and limit their use to the individual who bought them. The terms say that Amazon can revoke access to an e-book without notice if you violate them but nowhere do the terms of use say that Amazon can delete e-books after you buy them. In spite of this, Amazon did delete e-books for what is arguably a good reason -- it did not have the right to sell the e-books in the first place.
The underlying issue here is that Amazon, among many others, see the rules for digital as different than those for other things. It would never have crossed Amazon's collective mind to grab a physical book from you if the company had shipped you one that it did not have the right to sell. But, maybe because it could, Amazon just did what it has the ability to do without thinking to see if the ability to do something automatically meant that it was the right thing to do.
Amazon is not alone in confusing the ability to do something with the idea that it is the right thing to do. It would be inconceivable
that the U.S. Post Office would be required to make and save a record of who sent and received every letter it handled. Yet,
just because it can be done, a number of law enforcement officials have called for laws that require ISPs to do just that with e-mail.
It is rare indeed that buying something digital operates under the same rules as buying something physical. Amazon's own terms
of use is a perfect example. If you buy an e-book from Amazon it is not really yours. That is, you are not allowed to sell
it, loan it [to] a friend, donate it to a library or just about anything else that one can do with a physical book. The laws
permitting this type of very limited ownership may be changing. (See "Maybe you did buy that software after all" here.)
Maybe there is a future where you can buy something digital and treat it as if you actually owned it.
Comments (24)
How to handle this betterBy Mike Gebert on July 22, 2009, 1:21 pmThink how different this would have played if Amazon had done one simple, mildly costly (but definitely not Kindle-doom-costly) thing: mail everyone a hard copy...
Reply | Read entire comment
Digital RightsBy Anonymous on July 22, 2009, 1:21 pmThe following is only an observation since I do not have a really consistent solution to offer... Digital works do seem to be perceived on average as somewhat different...
Reply | Read entire comment
color me unconcernedBy Anonymous on July 22, 2009, 1:21 pmThe limitations from full-fledged ownership are reflected in the lower price. I don't confuse what I 'own' on my Kindle with what I 'own' on my real bookshelf. ...
Reply | Read entire comment
cloud computingBy Anonymous on July 22, 2009, 1:54 pmHow about those files of the clients who sign up for Google's "cloud" computing? If Amazon can't be trusted with a lousy book, can Google be trusted with your company's...
Reply | Read entire comment
Time for a Kindle ebook purchase moratoriumBy Anonymous on July 22, 2009, 2:09 pmMy local indepedent bookstore is currently having a going out of business sale, making their hardback prices competitive with Kindle. Think I'll lay off the Kindle...
Reply | Read entire comment
Wow - and I almost bought a Kindle!By Anonymous on July 22, 2009, 2:14 pmBut...I won't be. I was thinking - okay, I read so much that maybe I should get a Kindle. But what had already put me off - I can't take my used books to the used...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments