- New attack fells Internet Explorer
- Steve Jobs is a man of a few words
- Oddball gifts for uber geeks
- Global warming research exposed after hack
- Google adding IPv6 to YouTube
A few weeks ago I wrote about the first round of fallout that resulted from the press reports that Apple had rejected a Google Voice application after Google tried to add it to the App Store.
The next round in this likely long process has just started. Apple, AT&T and Google have sent the FCC answers to its questions. If you just read the first two of these responses you would get images: an Apple that has strong ideas on what is Right and is buried in poorly written applications, and a timorous AT&T afraid of the fragility of its network and of its business. Reading the third one paints a picture of Google as a kid not wanting to share its report card with adults.
The 10 best Google Android apps
10 iPhone apps that could get you into trouble
The letters do make it clear that some of the conspiracy theories being bandied about on the Internet over the last few weeks
that had AT&T telling a subservient Apple to block Google Voice were off the mark -- at least in this case. Both the AT&T letter and the Apple letter say that AT&T was not involved in Apple's review of the Google Voice application.
The two letters also say that AT&T has provided Apple with some rules about what kind of applications cannot be approved.
For example, AT&T wants to block some types of applications that use the AT&T cellular network, including voice over IP (VoIP)
applications, and applications that use a lot of bandwidth, such as TV redirectors. Note that neither of these apply to Google
Voice.
AT&T cries poverty about these applications -- poverty of network resources for the high-bandwidth applications and poverty of business model for the VoIP applications. I guess AT&T does not think it can get by just selling you data connectivity; it also needs to rip you off for minutes of voice airtime and SMS messages in order to get by.
Apple said that it spends a lot of time being a nanny to the App Store -- testing and rejecting buggy or naughty applications. Apparently, Apple thinks it will reflect poorly on the company if you download an application written by some amateur programmer and it crashes.
In its letter Apple said that it did not actually rejected Google Voice --- it was just in a long, thoughtful, review process. Long enough that it feels like rejection to some people. It also said that it had a problem with Google Voice's user interface, since it moved things around compared to the Apple user interface. Some commentators have said that is just a ruse that Apple is using to keep Google at bay.
Comments (4)
ObjectivityBy Anonymous on August 25, 2009, 7:38 am"it also needs to rip you off for minutes of voice airtime and SMS messages " What ever happened to objectivity and journalistic integrity? Since it's obvious that...
Reply | Read entire comment
seriously?By Anonymous on August 25, 2009, 5:33 pmThe writing in this article wouldn't be up to par in most high school newspapers. Besides wild swings from news to editorial and back, some of this clearly never...
Reply | Read entire comment
Mobile pricing is a crime not a rip-off!By Anon on August 26, 2009, 3:18 pmI see some others are attacking your journalistic parlance shall we say. Well, let me jump in the fray. ATT (and indeed all carriers) pricing structures are not...
Reply | Read entire comment
Truth is truthBy Anon on September 21, 2009, 7:07 pm"it also needs to rip you off for minutes of voice airtime and SMS messages" At this point I realized I was reading commentary from an intelligent and informed...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments