I thought I'd delve into a slightly less controversial subject this week (well, maybe). My technical background lacks significant hosting experience (servers, storage, operating systems, etc). I understand hosting systems and how to design them into networks, but I'm not going to argue the peculiarities of different Intel CPU designs.
When Cisco announced the Unified Computing System (UCS) last year, I looked at it as Cisco's entrance to the hosting (server) market. While it was interesting, it wasn't at the top of my list to learn. That changed a few weeks ago when I took Firefly's Cisco Data Center Unified Computing Implementation (DCUCI) v3 course.
Let me state early on I am not nor do I intend to be a UCS expert. There are plenty of other people with expertise on UCS, like my Firefly instructor, Dave Alexander, Colin McNamara, Scott Lowe, or Cisco themselves.

What shocked me was how much networking is involved in UCS. This should seem as a "duh" for a Cisco product, but it hadn't occurred to me before the Firefly course. I'm writing this blog because I have a feeling a lot of my readers are traditional network engineers (LANs, WANs, Data Centers, routing, etc) and had the same initial reaction to UCS. So, if your IT server team is evaluating UCS and you're not part of it, you have a problem.
Think of UCS as server blades (CPU cores and RAM) surrounded by a networking cloud. Even the NICs in the server can be virtualized with the Palo adapter card in the blades. Setting these NIC cards correctly involves proper network design, particularly if you are integrating with VMware ESX.
Here are just some of networking topics based on the Firefly UCS class:
See this blog as a call to action. If UCS is being evaluated by your hosting group, get involved. UCS is way too powerful to be turned into just another blade center. Hosting teams will most likely not have the technical skills to harness UCS's power which is networking based, so they will simplify or ignore key networking technologies that separate UCS from regular blade center systems. If that happens, you will never realize the cost savings, power, and productivity enhancements that come from UCS. It will just be another blade center in the data center, which would be extremely dissapointing.
More >From the Field blog entries:
Congress Needs to Step In for Net Neutrality...Really? Seriously?
It's Time to Start Loving Tunnels
Special Cisco Live Contest - Hottest Booth Girl
Our Cisco Live Certification Gift
Go to Cisco Subnet for more Cisco news, blogs, discussion forums, security alerts, book giveaways, and more.
Michael Morris is a communications engineering manager at a $3-billion high-tech company. His background is in enterprise WANs working with telcos and developing large-scale routing designs. He has worked on networks at government and corporate organizations, including networks at two Fortune 10 companies. In his current role, he leads a team of 10 engineers responsible for large-scale IT networking projects and architectural standards for data networks, storage area networks, IP telephony, contact centers, and security. Michael is CCIE #11733 and recently became one of the first three Cisco Certified Design Experts (CCDE) ever (#20080002). He has 11 years experience in networking and communications, including four years as a paratrooper in the U.S. Army. He has a bachelor's degree in MIS from the University at Buffalo and is working on his MBA from NC State University. In 2008, he was awarded the Network Professional Association (NPA) Professional Excellence and Innovation Award for his work on network architecture, templates and enterprise MPLS design.
Michael Morris's From the Field blog is also featured on the Cisco Learning Network. See it there, along with the blogs of other Cisco Experts.