Skip Links

Drone hunters lining up and paying out in Colorado

Deer Trail, Colo hasn’t yet voted on whether or not is will let residents hunt unmanned aircraft – FAA has warned such activity would be illegal

By Layer 8 on Thu, 09/05/13 - 3:01pm.

What might have started out a whimsical protest against government surveillance tactics has morphed into a little more than that as a small town in Colorado has found itself overwhelmed with requests and cash for a unmanned aircraft hunting license that doesn't exist  - yet.

In June a resident of Deer Trail, Colorado proposed a town wide ordinance that would offer $25 licenses to hunt and shoot down government drones if they flew within 1,000 feet above private property -- with a $100 bounty if one actually got shot down.   

[RELATED: What the drone invasion looks like]

The Denver Post this week reported  the town's clerk Kim Oldfield stopped counting the flood of requests for the licenses  two weeks ago when the tally of personal checks made out to the town hit 983  [Deer Trails' own population is about 560] and $19,006. The checks came from all over the U.S. Oldfield said. 

Oldfield went on to say she returned as many of the checks as she could before the work became overwhelming.  "I'm still getting the letters," she said. "I'm just throwing them in a big pile."

Deer Trail residents don't actually vote on the ordinance until Oct. 8, though the Denver Post reported that the town's board had a chance to approve the license ordinance last month but deadlocked 3-3.

As you might expect the Federal Aviation Administration hasn't taken too kindly to the Deer Trail idea. In July it said anyone who fire guns at drones is endangering the public and property and could be prosecuted or fined. 

[IN THE NEWS: Quick look: NASA's ambitious asteroid grabbing mission]

The AP reported that the FAA said: A drone "hit by gunfire could crash, causing damage to persons or property on the ground, or it could collide with other objects in the air," the statement said. "Shooting at an unmanned aircraft could result in criminal or civil liability, just as would firing at a manned airplane."

Follow Michael Cooney on Twitter: nwwlayer8 and on Facebook

Check out these other hot stories:

Scotch tape at heart of new nano-electronics technology

US uncorks $16 million for 17 projects to capture wave energy

We all may have a little Martian in us

Outgoing DHS chief Napolitano to successor: You will need a large bottle of Advil

Wall St. traders allegedly stole code, data with eye toward starting their own company

Gov't watchdog report outlines disturbing patent battle directions

Federal courts warn of increased jury duty scams

$10,000 for your thoughts: What would you send to the International Space Station?

DARPA wants computers that fuse with higher human brain function

Debate roils: Has NASA's Voyager spaceship has left our solar system - or not?

What are the next Big Space Life Questions?