<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Microsoft Subnet bloggers</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/blogs/microsoft</link>
 <description>Subnet - Microsoft bloggers</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How to capture your Progress in SSIS...</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48334</link>
 <description>An interesting question came up in a recent class regarding testing SSIS in Visual Studio: &quot;How can we capture the information in the Progress tab after a debug session?&quot;. My immediate reaction was to implement package logging but the answer lay elsewhere...
 Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48334#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22250">debug</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/20136">integration services</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24910">progress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6989">SQL Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3280">SQL Server 2008</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11972">SSIS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24911">ssis logging</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brian Egler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48334 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Enterprise 2.0: Great Advice on How to Get it Wrong from Andrew McAfee</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48330</link>
 <description>I just returned from the 13th annual KM World conference this week and listened to a really interesting keynote from Andrew McAfee (the &quot;king of Enterprise 2.0&quot; according to KM guru Tom Davenport).  McAfee summed up his talk with a list of basically how to get it Enterprise 2.0 wrong: Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48330#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24909">Andrew McAfee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22732">enterprise 2.0</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24878">Outlook Social Connector</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Susan Hanley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48330 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is 128-bit Windows a reality or just a great story?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48294</link>
 <description>News of a leak about Microsoft’s Windows 8 sure has stirred  something over the Internet. Some say Windows 8 won&#039;t happen until Windows 7 is perfected and others say that Microsoft has already begun  recruiting employees to help build  Windows 8. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48294#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24897">128bit OS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3643">operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/501">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24895">Windows 8</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24896">Windows 9</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Barrett</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48294 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CodySafe Admin Pack &amp; Launcher: The Swiss Army Knife of portable admin apps</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48240</link>
 <description>I have written the past about portable applications that Admins can carry with them. 


I came across a new &#039;suite&#039; of portable applications that are being touted as the Admins Swiss Army Knife, and for good reason.
The CodySafe Admin pack hosts 75 portable administrative tools into a single suite that installs onto a portable device and takes up less than 63MB of space. Within this tiny package...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48240#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/84">Outsourcing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24889">Codysafe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24890">portable applications</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Barrett</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48240 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unified Messaging (Voicemail) in Exchange 2010</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48189</link>
 <description>With the release of Exchange 2007, Microsoft included voicemail as one of the core components of the product, and as a v1.0 technology, we didn’t have a lot of organizations choose to implement the Exchange 2007 voicemail.  However with the release of Exchange 2010  and the inclusion of core features in the Exchange update, we’ve been implem Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48189#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24881">Exchange 2010;Rand Morimoto;Unified Messaging;Voicemail</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rand Morimoto</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48189 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Outlook 2010 to become Facebook for the enterprise</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48175</link>
 <description>Microsoft today announced  a plugin for Office 2010 that let&#039;s users access third-party social networks through  Outlook.The tool is dubbed Outlook Social Connector. While it&#039;s a great concept to turn e-mail into a social network, it may suffer the fate of many cool ideas from Microsoft: iffy execution. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48175#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1700">Outlook</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24877">Outlook 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23139">Outlook plug-ins</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24878">Outlook Social Connector</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/628">social networking</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48175 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DGard Network Manager: Complete network management in an easy to use tool</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48139</link>
 <description>One of the things that have become a reality of our current economy is that IT needs to more with less. In some cases that means taking on more tasks within the network as well. IT departments that once were once extremely segmented are now finding that they have been contracted to minuscule sizes in some cases. Of course, some IT shops have always had that chief, cook and bottle washer scenario. In...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48139#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1748">business intelligence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24873">DGard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2266">network management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24874">Software Compliance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Barrett</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48139 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>3 Most Important Announcements about Microsoft&#039;s Azure Cloud</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48129</link>
 <description>Microsoft&#039;s Ray Ozzie significantly blew past the basic Exchange, SharePoint and SQL database hosting services with the Azure announcements at PDC 2009 yesterday. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48129#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/33">E-commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22748">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/20309">access control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16570">ADFS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9894">Amazon EC2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7021">Android</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14036">App Store</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24866">AppExchange</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24868">AppFabric</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17202">Azure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24867">BizTalk 2009 Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/309">BlackBerry</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17417">Dallas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8820">Force.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17223">Geneva</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1188">iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9952">OpSource</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24865">OpSource Cloud</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24869">PinPoint.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/368">Ray Ozzie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/331">Salesforce.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/720">SOA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24870">Windows Moible 7</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48129 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft retrofits its cloud so apps can live on servers and Azure</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48089</link>
 <description>One week after Microsoft&#039;s Steven Elop took Salesforce.com&#039;s Marc Benioff to task claiming the cloud is not reliable, Microsoft officially launched the almost-final version of its own cloud, Windows Azure. It has newly outfitted its cloud  so that an app can live both on Azure and on a local  server. Microsoft today  announced new management features to Windows Azure that support  such dual-location...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48089#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9894">Amazon EC2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17202">Azure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7628">cloud computing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17195">Windows Azure</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48089 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Server Sizing in Exchange 2010</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48015</link>
 <description>I’ve been blogging this entire month on Exchange 2010, everything from the basics of what’s new in Exchange 2010 to Migrating from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 to Migrating from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010 to Integrating Exchange 2010 with OCS 2007 R2.  One of the questions I get asked frequently is “what’s the right size servers for Exchange 2010?”  That’s always a fun topic because...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/48015#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24855">Exchange 2010;Rand Morimoto;Server Sizing;Performance Analysis</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rand Morimoto</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48015 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SRV Records and Active Directory</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47996</link>
 <description>Any discussion of DNS and Active Directory must come quickly to a discussion of the AD “signposts” known as the SRV (service locator) records. SRV is just another resource record type, like A and PTR and MX. It is defined in the RFC 2782 document, which states that “The SRV RR allows administrators to use several servers for a single domain, to move services from host to host with little fuss,...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47996#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/949">DNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24852">domain locator</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5245">Server 2008</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24851">service locator records</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24850">srv records</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Glenn Weadock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47996 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lokad makes statistical forecasting accessible to small, medium and large businesses to help them lower costs.</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47949</link>
 <description>Lokad has democratized time series forecasting for businesses of all sizes. Whether you&#039;re a small coffee shop or a division of a large enterprise, forecasting point-of-sales, scheduling staff, call center management, eCommerce, enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), all became easier because of Lokad&#039;s forecast-on-demand service. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47949#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24835">hosted application</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24836">Lokad</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23312">Microsoft Excel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17618">Microsoft Startup Zone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/754">SaaS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9951">software-as-a-service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1999">startup</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alpa Agarwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47949 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Understanding Shadow Redundancy in Exchange 2010</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47946</link>
 <description>One of the improvements made in Exchange 2010 is the redundancy built-in to the routing of messages through the Exchange environment.  Microsoft built-in a technology they call “Shadow Redundancy” which the concept behind shadow redundancy is that a message is not deleted from the queue until the next hop has confirmed delivery to the subsequent hop.&amp;nb Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47946#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24834">Exchange 2010;Rand Morimoto;Shadow Redundancy;Routing</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rand Morimoto</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47946 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Secure Updates in Server 2008 DNS</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47856</link>
 <description>One of the big benefits of combining AD and DNS on the same system using Active Directory Integrated (ADI) zones is that you can specify that dynamic updates should be “secure.” (This operation is accomplished either through the DNS administrative console or the DNSCMD command line tool. You’re given the choice in the new zone wizard but you can always change it later on.)
 Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47856#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/949">DNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24781">domain name service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13593">Domain Name System</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24833">dynamic updates</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24832">secure updates</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5245">Server 2008</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Glenn Weadock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47856 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SQL Server 2008 R2: November CTP Feature Pack</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47854</link>
 <description>To ensure that SQL Server continues to live up to the promised hype. Micorsoft has released the Novemebr CTP feature pack. The feature pack is a collection of packages that will help to expand and improve SQL Server 2008 R2. Some useful packages that I saw in the CTP are:

 Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47854#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23339">SQL Server 2008 R2</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Barrett</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47854 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft&#039;s data cache technology, code-named Velocity, speeds app performance</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47832</link>
 <description>Microsoft is achieving impressive performance gains with &quot;Velocity&quot;, the code name for a new Microsoft data caching technology currently in Community Technical Preview. Velocity is a distributed in-memory application cache technology that combines in-memory data caches across multiple servers, appearing as one large data cache to data hungry applications. By accessing data in Velocity data caches,...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47832#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3194">application performance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24829">data cache</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/18500">Live Framework</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4261">Microsoft research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6989">SQL Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24830">Technology Preview</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12922">velocity</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47832 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Top 10 PDC sessions for an enterprise .Net developer</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47784</link>
 <description>There will be  over 150 sessions at Microsoft&#039;s Professional Developer&#039;s Conference, next week at the Los Angeles convention center. Many of them will be aimed at commercial programmers building their next Windows app. So I asked a Microsoft spokesperson if she could pinpoint what Microsoft thinks will be the most important sessions for an enterprise developer. I also came up with a list of my own...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47784#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47784 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Migrating from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47778</link>
 <description>In my last blog post I covered the migration process from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010.  In this post, I’m going to outline the sequence and provide tips, tricks, and best practices to look forward to in the migration process from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47778#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24810">Exchange 2010;Rand Morimoto;migrating;Exchange 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rand Morimoto</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47778 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Active Directory Integrated DNS Zones</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47773</link>
 <description>In my last posting I mentioned that it’s not necessarily a good idea to always separate AD DS (Active Directory Domain Services) and DNS on different systems. Let’s now take a closer look at why that might be the case.

If you run DNS on domain controllers, you have the opportunity to use something called Active Directory Integrated zones, or ADI zones. In classical DNS, the zone information...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47773#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24809">active directory integrated zone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24808">adi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/949">DNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5245">Server 2008</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Glenn Weadock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47773 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft Missed Perfect Chance To Contribute GPL Code</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47668</link>
 <description>Using open source software in your product. Doesn&#039;t Microsoft know that bloggers, techno-dudes and everyone else is watch them like a hawk waiting for Microsoft to make a GPL license misstep? Friday blogger Rafael Rivera called Microsoft on the carpet accusing Redmond of lifting code from the ImageMaster project for use in a Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool (WUDT) for netbooks. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47668#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23208">GPLv2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/260">open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7678">Windows 7</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47668 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
