<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Microsoft Subnet bloggers</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/blogs/microsoft</link>
 <description>Subnet - Microsoft bloggers</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft warns of SSL/TLS vulnerabilities</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57375</link>
 <description>First of all, this isn&#039;t just another Microsoft security flaw. Microsoft has filed this with ICASI as a general security vulnerability affecting multiple implementations of TLS and SSL. Moreover, Microsoft has noted it affects every currently supported version of Microsoft operating systems from Windows 2000 to Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57375#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2220">OCS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1831">Office Communications Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alex Lewis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57375 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Installing PerformancePoint 2010 Dashboard Designer</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57376</link>
 <description>PerformancePoint Dashboard Designer is the design tool you will use to build key performance indicators (KPIs), indicators, scorecards, reports, filters, data sources, and dashboards. It also enables you to deploy your finished dashboards to SharePoint.Dashboard Designer is a .NET Framework ClickOnce application that requires the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1. It also has a few other optional components that...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57376#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5052">PerformancePoint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25674">PerformancePoint 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25651">PPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21277">SharePoint 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25673">SPS 2010</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ola Ekdahl</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57376 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft to shut off free versions of Windows 7 soon</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57353</link>
 <description>On March 1, users of the free, release candidate versions of Windows 7 will experience bi-hourly shut downs, Microsoft says. These shut downs will continue until June 1. On June 1, the RC version has officially expired. Microsoft will replace the wallpaper with a background that says the copy of Windows is not  genuine. After June 1,those who haven&#039;t upgraded to a purchased copy of Windows 7, which...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57353#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7678">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/808">Windows Genuine Advantage</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57353 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft fixes 26 security holes, warns on unpatched multi-vendor SSL vulnerability</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57359</link>
 <description>As expected, today&#039;s Patch Tuesday is a doozie. Microsoft  released 13  bulletins to fix  26 vulnerabilities in Windows and Microsoft Office. This includes the first Hyper-V-specific patch. But wait, there&#039;s more.  Microsoft also issued a security advisory (977377) over  a publicly-known  vulnerability in the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer  (SSL) protocols. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57359#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4769">Microsoft security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14943">Microsoft Security alert</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1478">Patch Tuesday</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/451">SSL</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57359 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re-Thinking the Search Engine</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57223</link>
 <description>When looking to travel, I use Fodors.com for quick information about destinations. I’m a sucker for Fodors, having become used to the well-organized information in their hard-copy travel guides. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57223#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22205">Bing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25654">Decision Engine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8290">Google Search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/562">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/124">Yahoo</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13995">Yahoo search</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alpa Agarwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57223 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Can Microsoft be the new Apple? Why failure would be its savior</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57213</link>
 <description>The world is agog at the most obvious editorial published in the New York Times yesterday about Microsoft&#039;s lack of innovation. Today, Microsoft responded with equal predictability. The thing is, Microsoft has always been a follower. It hasn&#039;t  got a roster of ground-breaking ideas to its credit. It has risen to success by noticing others&#039; great technologies and building its own version that works...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57213#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2222">innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16250">Microsoft financials</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4261">Microsoft research</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57213 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Configuring PerformancePoint 2010 Time Intelligence</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57200</link>
 <description>Simple Time Period SpecificationA common requirement of clients is to allow end users to filter data from scorecards and reports on a dashboard based on a Time Intelligence formula. Time Intelligence formulas allow users to view data over time such as Year Over Year (YOY), Last Period, Rolling Average, and Year To Date (YTD). Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57200#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5052">PerformancePoint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25651">PPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/731">SharePoint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21277">SharePoint 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25652">Time Intelligence</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ola Ekdahl</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57200 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IE flaw that lets remote hackers read your hard drive is extra bad for XP users</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57152</link>
 <description>On Wednesday a security researcher demonstrated a flaw in Internet Explorer at the Black Hat DC conference that could allow a hacker to remotely read files on the victim&#039;s local drive. The demonstration prompted a security advisory from Microsoft.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57152#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15797">browser security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25640">IE Protected Mode</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/92">Internet Explorer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4769">Microsoft security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14943">Microsoft Security alert</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57152 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SharePoint 2010 in Action: US Olympic Committee Press Box</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56986</link>
 <description>The US Olympic Committee recently announced a new press site built on SharePoint 2010.  The new site, USOC PressBox, demonstrates the rich image capabilities available with SharePoint 2010&#039;s native Silverlight integration. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56986#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21277">SharePoint 2010</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Susan Hanley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56986 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SharePoint 2010 and Social: It can only get better</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56834</link>
 <description>Seems like Microsoft is determined to position SharePoint 2010 solidly in the &quot;Enterprise 2.0&quot; space.  Check out this really cool story about Microsoft&#039;s invitation to extend the SharePoint 2010 social platform and the winner of the SocialFest competition.  Now, the question is what will happen to these 2010 extensions - will they be incorporated into the product or be developed and marketed as third-party...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56834#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21277">SharePoint 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25608">SharePoint 2010 SocialFest</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16212">social computing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Susan Hanley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56834 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Calinda MindUp helps make email interactions more efficient</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56645</link>
 <description>Calinda Software’s MindUP is a software-as-a-service solution that helps workgroups collaborate more efficiently, within the email environment, that most of us are used to. A user would set up a MindUP group, including identifying its members, and start by sending an email message to the group. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56645#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25593">Calind Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/50">collaboration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/519">email</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22732">enterprise 2.0</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25594">MindUP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/754">SaaS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1661">software as a service</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alpa Agarwal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56645 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Sparse should Sparse columns be?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56639</link>
 <description>There has always been an almost religious argument between DBA&#039;s over nullable columns. Should you use them or should you not? NULL means nothing is stored in a column. Not spaces, not zeroes, just nothing. NOT NULL means a value must be stored in the column. Using NULL may save space but causes aggravation for developers as they have to check the column for NULLs before using that column. Now with...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56639#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25586">filtered indexes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25588">NOT NULL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25587">NULL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25585">sparse columns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6989">SQL Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23339">SQL Server 2008 R2</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brian Egler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56639 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SMB Signing and Security</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56638</link>
 <description>Server Message Block security has two main components: user-level and share-level. The first is for accessing servers, and the second is for accessing files, folders, and printers if share-level authentication has been configured on the server. Most readers of this column already know about these aspects of SMB security, but you may not know about another feature called “SMB signing.” This is a...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56638#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25584">man-in-the-middle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21196">server 2003</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5245">Server 2008</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25410">server message block</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/810">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6225">SMB signing</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Glenn Weadock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56638 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Windows SharePoint Services (WSS) in Windows 2008 R2</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56630</link>
 <description>One of the questions I get frequently is “What’s the difference between the Windows SharePoint Services that comes with Windows Server and the Microsoft Office SharePoint Service (MOSS) that you pay extra for.  I pulled an excerpt from my book “Windows Server 2008 R2 Unleashed” where we clarify that exact question… Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56630#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25583">Windows 2008 R2;SharePoint;WSS;Rand Morimoto</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 06:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rand Morimoto</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56630 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unicode Compression helps in R2</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56614</link>
 <description>One new feature in SQL Server 2008 R2 is Unicode Compression. Unicode provides support for all the international character sets across the world including Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese. The trade off is that unicode requires 2 bytes per character as opposed to standard character data types that use one byte per character. That&#039;s double the storage. R2 attempts to save most of this overhead...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56614#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12839">compression</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13318">CTP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17072">Data Compression</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6989">SQL Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23339">SQL Server 2008 R2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25581">unicode</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brian Egler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56614 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Startup Huddle wins Microsoft&#039;s SharePoint 2010 contest</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56611</link>
 <description>On Friday, Microsoft announced that Huddle was the winner of a  weeklong, invitational contest, in which seven startups were challenged to build a social app for SharePoint 2010 in just one week. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56611#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25579">Calinda</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/50">collaboration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24303">Huddle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25580">Loq8</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21277">SharePoint 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/628">social networking</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56611 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Better Windows World Tool Library - The Finale&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56598</link>
 <description>Well all good things must come to an end they say and so I have to say goodbye.  Although I will not be posting regularly anymore I will drop by as a ‘guest blogger’ from time to time. 

I thought it would be great to end with my final update to the tools library.   So here is the last library update all 198 tools I have blogged about ( good and bad) in the last 20 months. 

I just want to...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56598#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/20818">free Windows software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/20820">low-cost network management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1048">Open Source Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/20819">open source software for Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14595">Ron Barrett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/20817">Windows tools</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Barrett</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56598 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Group Policy Enhancements in Windows 2008 R2</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56583</link>
 <description>Most of what is “new” in Group Policy enhancements in Windows 2008 R2 were actually in Windows 2008, however many organizations never migrated off Active Directory 2003 to Active Directory 2008, so this is all new to administrators who have basically gone from Active Directory straight to Active Directory 2008 R2.  What Microsoft has done with Group Policies in Windows 2008 (and 2008 R Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56583#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25576">Windows 2008 R2;Group Policies;Policy Management;Rand Morimoto</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rand Morimoto</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56583 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sparklines, Data Bars and Indicators</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56581</link>
 <description>One major part of SQL Server 2008 R2 is ReportBuilder 3.0 which allows you an alternative report editor in addition to the Report Designer in Visual Studio 2008. Some new features include Sparklines, Data Bars and Indicators. I have been testing them out with the SQL Server 2008 R2 Nov CTP. Let&#039;s take a look.
 Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56581#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25543">ReportBuilder 3.0</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/18328">reporting services</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6989">SQL Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23339">SQL Server 2008 R2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/18329">ssrs</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brian Egler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56581 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft gags ex-CFO Chris Liddel and pays him $1.9M</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56577</link>
 <description>Nothing like being paid almost two million bucks for leaving a job and keeping your mouth shut -- one $950,000 check a month after you&#039;ve left and another $950,000 six months later. That&#039;s the sweet deal Microsoft gave Chris Liddell, the company&#039;s former chief financial officer who officially resigned on November 24. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/56577#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5858">Chris Liddell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4343">Microsoft earnings</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/18805">Microsoft executives</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16250">Microsoft financials</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56577 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
