In Backspin this week I discuss the case of a substitute teacher who has been found guilty of “child endangerment” through (it is alledged) exposing them to on-line pornography. She could be sentenced to 40 years in jail. You get just 20 years for murder …
|
|
Substitute teacher found guilty
Surely this can't be the end of it?! First of all, they tried the wrong person. And second, the punishment is so far out of line. What a travesty.
This case should not be a matter for the courts
There is plenty to be outraged about in the Amero case:
I suppose that there is really no way to outlaw stupidity in any form, inexperience will always be with us, and there is little to be done about youthful indiscretions. In this case there is a lot of all three. The bottom line is that you are right - this case should not be a matter for the courts.
Both the prosecutor and the
Both the prosecutor and the judge in this case have already been promoted within the system and the victim will never be able to clear her name. Until dirtbags in the judical system and other positions of "authority", stop being rewarded for destroying people lives, we'll have to expect only an increase in these types of Nazi witch hunts. Just ask anyone with darker skin and a beard about Nazi witch hunts by those in positions of "authority".
On the deck
When this problem moves to -- (Hypothetically) I have a home WiFi network that I don't secure, my neighbor also does. As a normal user -- when I go out to my deck and open my laptop and it 'discovers' the strongest signal which just happens to be the neighbors and not mine. Does this constitute an invasion?