|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
From a strategic
From a strategic perspective, this is a good idea for Nortel - spearhead a (for now) a proprietary alternative technology instead of competing with heavy-hitters like CSCO and JNPR on their own turf.
However, it seems that Nortel has a message problem of exactly where this fits in and what its true benefits are, if any.
In addition, I think there is quite a bit of skepticism on the part of Service Providers about putting too much faith in Nortel's ability to deliver and support new features in a timely manner. Betting on PBT will tie you closely to NT whether you like it not - a shaky proposition based on demonstrated performance over the last 6-7 years.
In general, people just don't trust Nortel's technical savvy the way they do Cisco's and Juniper's.