|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Interesting. I share your opinion!
Hi Neil,
Thanks for the link. Very interesting indeed.
Essentially, my first message was about agreeing with your comment, while not really understanding the connection to Woot.
But I must say that I completely share your opinion. Assuming that it could be produced, a fully-secure but closed system would not be very useful. Nowadays, systems are useful because they are connected, and the same connections that give value to our systems can be used to attack them. Therefore, instead of protecting connections, protecting information (and processes) should be the focus.
Also, as you mention, context-awareness and behavior-awareness are going to become more and more important because of the trend towards distributed computing and ultimately ubiquitous, pervasive and ambient intelligence computing.
In fact, just a few weeks ago I have submitted a proposal for an ERC project based on a similar idea: A framework for computing with protected information.
Best regards,
Antonio.