|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
QoS
You can use the "free" function in the router called NBAR. (Network Based Application Recognition) - this is a very powerful function that works with QoS to provide queueing and bandwidth throttling.
Some people feel the need to go find point products to do what your network equipment can already do if you just research the capabilities of the products. The additional problem is that for the products to be truly effective they must control ingress/egress at every location which means a lot more complexity and hardware in your enterprise.
In regards to previous statements about inline v. WCCP. WCCP is a good protocol and any vendor can use it, however you will find that Riverbed is very reluctant to use WCCP (not sure why) and will almost INSIST that they deploy inline. Cisco's inline deployment performs completely differently and can identify VLAN's so traffic on a VOICE VLAN for instance will be hooked to the "WAN" port and not processed. WCCP is still the best way to implement any optimization as it scales easier, load balances, and is out of path so it is easy to bring up and down during production.
I believe Nanometrics reached out to Network World for the article. I don't think Cisco knew about it when it came out.