This is so ludicrous as to render me sterile. Zero-day bug with a 348 day lifespan? Most IT managers are woefully ignorant of even the most basic security elements let alone how long they've lived with a vulnerability. Patching ONLY addresses KNOWN system flaws. It DOES NOT address unknown issues nor the threat conditions that can actually cause harm. So much of the industry banter is focused on patching that people have lost focus on the true source of problems: threats. A fully-patched a properly configured network is still at-risk from abuse, data leakage, errors and malicious activity. People just have to know what is happening. Unfortunately, the complexity of most tools makes even a basic understanding difficult and expensive at the very least.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|