Latest software headlines from Network World:
Quick fix for Firefox 3 bug with Yahoo Mail
Continuent launches open-source database scale-out stack
Google extends Apps Premier credit for Gmail outages
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Did this really surprise anyone?
This is precisely why all of the "indemnification" money paid by alleged "infringers" should have gone directly into an escrow account while awaiting the outcome of the various trials.
An interesting racket, in any case: allege that some large number of defendants have infringed on your rights despite lack of evidence; take what is essentially "protection" money from some of them, spend that money to sue the others, stall in court for years and then finally declare bankruptcy as the entire scheme collapses. Doesn't this have the feel of a classic Ponzi scheme?