These guys are just as wrong as the geniuses that claim all you need is a firewall at the perimeter. Neither approach is correct (securing only the endpoint or securing only the perimeter), and neither provides a defense in depth. Securing both the endpoints and the perimeter are, and have been, critical for as long as I've been in technology. Anyone in a securty role making any other claim to their employer should be fired for gross incompetence.
About the only thing the Jericho forum members managed to get right is that the traditional idea of a clear line between the trusted and untrusted network has disappeard entirely. But that's been a blurry line, at best, for as long as the concept existed.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|