|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Hit the nail on the head
Man, you hit the nail on the head. I have been saying for years now, the carriers and phone manufacturers should put more emphasis on the phone actually making a reliable call, than adding in useless features that may or may not even work because of weaknesses in the underlying network.
I don't want a TV on my phone. I don't want to play games, have annoying ring tones, or any other useless junk. I use my phone for work and for communication. I want to be able to make a call, and have that call be loud and clear and not drop when I go around a corner or down a hill.
I also must agree. I have had AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon Verizon has the best reception and coverege. My sprint phone barely worked in many popular places where it should. The AT&T phone worked in my house but not in my basement. My Verizon phone works everywhere.