Big deal. A modest configuration feature that does what? Change firewall policy for an individual?! If any administrator is putzing around with this kind of minutia they deserve to be sacked. Perimeter policy should be immutable for everyone in order to ensure a secure, stable operation.
Palo Alto is making a huge stretch in a commodity-based market, trying to justify yet another redundant piece of equipment and have someone cough up 30 to 60 k for so-called peace-of-mind anyone could get with just a little bit of effort. BORING!
Latest software headlines from Network World:
Red Hat undercuts Microsoft on high-performance OS pricing
For Microsoft shops, Silverlight 2.0 trumps Flash
One of the 'big four' management vendors could be acquired in the next few years - Network ...
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
