|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
SSL spoofing
If you are concerned about your IT controled device spoofing you, what are your chances of a man-in-the-middle pas-through ssl authentication? These techniques are already in practice. Extended validation trying to recoop some of the damage. EV comes at a price. One dropped EV check and your back to login. EV also has the additional burdon on every stage of the network. Unless I miss my guess... Juniper is moving where I think we have to go. MPLS supported SSL forwarding with QOS support. This whole argument goes back to 2001 UWTV discussion on stateful connections in a stateless Internet. I don't know about you but no company I know can afford to nail up static dedicated routes to all of their dependant liabilities. Gets to be a think or swim choice. Should enties that transport your SSL and have this technology be certified and bonded? I think so.