|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
You've made a good point
Your concern about social networking data being used in ways that were not intended by the owner of the information is a valid one. However, this happens all the time -- our data is sold to publishers, banks, credit card companies, credit reporting agencies and the like. Our junk postal mail is a daily tribute to the fact that our personal information is being bought and sold and is available to just about anyone who wants it.
The advantage that I see with social networking data aggregation is that you can provide only that information you want to have made public -- you can withhold personal information, for example. Plus, if a standard for this type of aggregation was developed, there could be an opt-out provision built into each social networking site. For example, if I posted my data on Facebook, I could check a box that would restrict Facebook from sharing this data with other social networking sites. Plus, we could always change our data, delete certain parts of it, etc.