Latest software headlines from Network World:
Oracle integrates CRM On Demand with Siebel
Mozilla extension would tap into typed commands
iPhone fantasy football draft tools
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Look at the Received Hraders
The company claims to have no knowledge of who is sending out the ads they disclaim responsibility for. Looking at the Received Headers gives a good idea of where they are coming from (especially if the injection point is their SMTP Server). They should be looking at the injection points if they claim the ads are not theirs instead of just being willing to benefit from the ads. IMO, so long as you benefit from the ad, you are responsible for it (even if someone else sent it, with or without your permission or request) unless you make an effort to track down unauthorized ads sent in your name or for your benefit.