|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Security issues?
"Given what we are seeing in the way of security issues on Vista I think it will be a while before anyone wants to trust their enterprise to IPv6."
Could you be specific? Because I think if you remove emotion from the equation Vista is fundamentally a much better OS.
But don't take my word for it...
Most resistance to Vista I see is cultural - it's "Different". Yes, there are a few technical issues - mainly software compatibility (which shouldn't be a surprise), but over all Vista is leaps and bounds a better operating system - especially for a corporate environment. The management tools built into Vista make XP almost a toy by comparison.
Oh yeah, Vista has a pretty decent IPV6 stack, and so does Mac OS X and Linux. The real issue is with the network equipment vendors (primarily Cisco). Until all pieces of a network are IPV6 compliant, it's pretty hard to make the switch. The analogy to Y2K is a good one - except with IPv6 there is no drop dead date - no zero hour to spur progress. I wouldn't be surprised if portions of the Internet never make the transition.