The problem is that people like .. "Anonymous" do not have the guts to tell people what the truth is. Also they themselves act like Ostrich. IF they have not read the 6000 pages themselves does not mean that others have not made an attempt to read it and comment on its sad nature. Such commentators as Anonymous who aim to show that all was fair in practice at the BRM should be ashamed of calling themselves capable of technical asessment by any means if they find DIS 29500 worthy of being a standard by any means. What will you say to a document whose scope itself has been changed at the end of BRM ??? " I would not be surprised if the reposne to this - so, where is the problem ?"